Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Generalized central-character summands

Statement

Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, a Cartan subalgebra h, and a positive Borel b=hn+. Write Q+=iZ0αi, μλ when λμQ+, and wλ=w(λ+ρ)ρ.

Every MO decomposes canonically into finitely many nonzero generalized central-character submodules:

M=χMχ.

For each summand there is a single N1 such that mχNMχ=0. The decomposition of zero is empty.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The setting above and the hypotheses in the statement.

[F1]

Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, a Cartan subalgebra h, and a positive Borel b=hn+. Write Q+=iZ0αi, μλ when λμQ+, and wλ=w(λ+ρ)ρ. For MO and Z=Z(U(g)), the image algebra Z/AnnZ(M) is finite dimensional over C. (The center has finite-dimensional image on each O-object)

[F2]

Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, a Cartan subalgebra h, and a positive Borel b=hn+. Write Q+=iZ0αi, μλ when λμQ+, and wλ=w(λ+ρ)ρ. Let Z=Z(U(g)) and let χ:ZC be a unital complex-algebra character, as in def-central-character-of-a-lie-algebra-module. Put mχ=kerχ and, for M in def-bgg-category-o, define Mχ={vM:mχNv=0 for some integer N1}. Here mχNv=0 means every element of that ideal kills v; the exponent may initially depend on v. The full subcategory Oχ consists of the objects with M=Mχ. This is a generalized central-character condition, weaker than scalar central action. It does not by definition assert that Oχ is an indecomposable block. (Generalized central-character subcategories)

[F3]

Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, a Cartan subalgebra h, and a positive Borel b=hn+. Write Q+=iZ0αi, μλ when λμQ+, and wλ=w(λ+ρ)ρ. The category O is closed under submodules, quotients and finite direct sums and is an abelian category. If 0AEB0 is exact, A,BO, and E is h-semisimple, then EO. The middle-term weight hypothesis is essential. (Category O is abelian and extension closed among weight modules)

Proof

1.1

If M=0 there is nothing to split. Otherwise let R=Z/AnnZ(M), a nonzero finite-dimensional commutative algebra. Choose a vector-space basis a1,,ad of R and consider commuting multiplication operators on its regular representation R.

F1construct
2.1

For each ai, its minimal polynomial splits over C into powers of distinct linear factors. Bezout identities for these relatively prime factors produce polynomial projections onto their generalized eigenspaces: the polynomials are 1 modulo one factor and 0 modulo every other, hence are orthogonal idempotents summing to 1 when evaluated at ai. Multiply these commuting projections for all i and omit zero products. We obtain nonzero orthogonal elements etR summing to 1 and ideals Rt=etR.

algebrastep 1.1
3.1

On Rt, multiplication by each ai has one eigenvalue cit and aietcitet is nilpotent. The ideal Jt generated by these finitely many commuting nilpotents is nilpotent: if their nilpotence exponents are ni, any product of more than i(ni1) generators vanishes. Since the ai span R, Rt/Jt is spanned by et; it is nonzero because a nilpotent ideal cannot contain its nonzero unit. Thus this quotient is C and gives a unique character χt:RC on that factor.

algebrastep 2.1
4.1

The et act centrally on M, so M=tetM as g-modules, with each summand in O. A fixed power of kerχt kills etM by the nilpotence just proved, where χt is composed with ZR. For a different character ψ of Z, choose z with ψ(z)χt(z). On etM, zψ(z) is a nonzero scalar plus a nilpotent operator, hence is invertible by a finite geometric series. It cannot kill a nonzero vector to any power.

F2F3algebrastep 3.1
5.1

It follows that the intrinsic submodule Mχt is exactly etM and all other Mχ vanish. This proves independence from the chosen basis and projections, as well as the common annihilating power on each summand.

F2algebrastep 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources