How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Generalized central-character summands
Statement
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and .
Every decomposes canonically into finitely many nonzero generalized central-character submodules:
For each summand there is a single such that . The decomposition of zero is empty.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The setting above and the hypotheses in the statement.
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . For and , the image algebra is finite dimensional over . (The center has finite-dimensional image on each O-object)
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . Let and let be a unital complex-algebra character, as in def-central-character-of-a-lie-algebra-module. Put and, for in def-bgg-category-o, define Here means every element of that ideal kills ; the exponent may initially depend on . The full subcategory consists of the objects with . This is a generalized central-character condition, weaker than scalar central action. It does not by definition assert that is an indecomposable block. (Generalized central-character subcategories)
Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra , a Cartan subalgebra , and a positive Borel . Write , when , and . The category is closed under submodules, quotients and finite direct sums and is an abelian category. If is exact, , and is -semisimple, then . The middle-term weight hypothesis is essential. (Category O is abelian and extension closed among weight modules)
Proof
If there is nothing to split. Otherwise let , a nonzero finite-dimensional commutative algebra. Choose a vector-space basis of and consider commuting multiplication operators on its regular representation .
For each , its minimal polynomial splits over into powers of distinct linear factors. Bezout identities for these relatively prime factors produce polynomial projections onto their generalized eigenspaces: the polynomials are 1 modulo one factor and 0 modulo every other, hence are orthogonal idempotents summing to 1 when evaluated at . Multiply these commuting projections for all and omit zero products. We obtain nonzero orthogonal elements summing to 1 and ideals .
On , multiplication by each has one eigenvalue and is nilpotent. The ideal generated by these finitely many commuting nilpotents is nilpotent: if their nilpotence exponents are , any product of more than generators vanishes. Since the span , is spanned by ; it is nonzero because a nilpotent ideal cannot contain its nonzero unit. Thus this quotient is and gives a unique character on that factor.
The act centrally on , so as -modules, with each summand in . A fixed power of kills by the nilpotence just proved, where is composed with . For a different character of , choose with . On , is a nonzero scalar plus a nilpotent operator, hence is invertible by a finite geometric series. It cannot kill a nonzero vector to any power.
It follows that the intrinsic submodule is exactly and all other vanish. This proves independence from the chosen basis and projections, as well as the common annihilating power on each summand.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- §15.1 Corollary 15.7 and proof, p.80 (standard reference, not scraped)