Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hensel factor lifting over a complete valued field

Statement

Let F be complete nonarchimedean, A its valuation ring, and k its residue field. Suppose gA[T] has nonzero reduction gˉ=h0H0, where h0k[T] is monic and gcd(h0,H0)=1. Then g=hH for h,HA[T], with h monic of degree degh0, hˉ=h0, Hˉ=H0. No discreteness or monicity of g is assumed. In particular, a simple residue root of a monic polynomial lifts uniquely to a simple root in A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.

[F1]

Absolute values on a field: Let F be a field. An absolute value on F is a function :FR0 such that for all x,yF: x=0    x=0,xy=xy,x+yx+y. It is nonarchimedean when it satisfies the stronger inequality x+ymax{x,y} for all x,yF. It is trivial when x=1 for every nonzero xF.

Proof

1.1

If the valuation is trivial, A=k=F and the original factorization suffices. If h0=1, take h=1 and H=g. Otherwise put m=degh0>0, N=degg, lift h0 to a monic h1 of degree m and H0 to H1 of degree at most N-m. Lift a Bezout relation to polynomials r,s with h1r+H1s1 modulo the maximal ideal. Among the finitely many nonzero coefficients of gh1H1 and h1r+H1s1, choose one of maximum absolute value, or any element with value strictly between zero and one if both errors vanish. Denote it by pi. Then both errors lie in I[T], where I=(π)={x:xπ} and 0<π<1.

F1given
2.1

Suppose ghnHnIn[T], hn,Hnh1,H1 modulo I, with the stated degree bounds. Put en=(ghnHn)/πnA[T]. Over A/I we need qH1+Qh1=en. Multiply the fixed Bezout relation by en; then divide ens by the monic h1, writing ens=h1u+q, degq<m. Take Q=enr+uH1. Modulo I, monicity of h1 and deg(enqH1)N imply degQNm. Delete higher coefficients of Q, which lie in I. This explicitly solves the congruence with bounded degrees.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Set hn+1=hn+πnq and Hn+1=Hn+πnQ. Their product equals g modulo In+1, since 2nn+1, and all degree bounds persist. This deterministic correction uses only the initial finite lifts and polynomial division, so no new arbitrary residue representatives are chosen at successive stages. The finitely many coefficient sequences are Cauchy because πn0. Completeness gives limits h,H in A[T], with h monic of degree m, and continuity of finite multiplication gives g=hH and the prescribed reductions.

step 2.1
4.1

For a simple root aˉ of monic fˉ, apply the factorization to (Taˉ)H0 with H0(aˉ)0. Write f=(Ta)H. Then H(a) is a unit, so f(a)0. If b is another root with bˉ=aˉ, then H(b) is a unit and (ba)H(b)=0 forces b=a. This proves both existence and uniqueness of the simple-root lift.

step 3.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources