How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Henselian factor lifting descends to quotients
Statement
Let be a Henselian pair and let be an ideal. Then the quotient pair has the coprime monic factor-lifting property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Henselian pair and an ideal .
A Henselian pair uniquely lifts coprime monic factorizations modulo its defining ideal (Henselian pairs and Henselian local rings).
Proof
The quotient map is integral because every element of satisfies a monic linear equation over the image of . The integral-base-change lemma for Henselian pairs in Stacks tag 09XD therefore applies to the Henselian pair and shows that the quotient pair is again Henselian.
By [L1], every Henselian pair has the coprime monic factor-lifting property. Applying that definition to the pair from step 1.1 gives the claimed lifting property for .
Hence Henselian factor lifting descends to quotients.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 15.11: Henselian pairs (standard reference, not scraped)