Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local braiding operators satisfy adjacent braid and distant commutation relations

Statement

Let V be a left module over a quasitriangular Hopf algebra and let n≥2. Set Rˇ:=cV,V, with c as in A quasitriangular structure gives and is recovered from a module braiding. For 1≤i<n, let Ti be the operator on V⊗n that acts by Rˇ on tensor positions i,i+1 and by the identity on every other position, using the canonical associators of Associator naturality, pentagon, unit triangle and symmetry hexagons on elementary tensors. Then TiTi+1Ti=Ti+1TiTi+1(1≤i<n−1),TiTj=TjTi(∣i−j∣>1). These relations are the local operator facts used by later Hecke constructions; no quadratic relation is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a quasitriangular Hopf algebra (H,R), a left H-module V, and an integer n≥2.

[F1]

A quasitriangular structure gives and is recovered from a module braiding: Rˇ=cV,V=τ(ρV⊗ρV)(R) is an invertible operator and satisfies the three-factor braid relation by the QYBE.

[F2]

Counit normalization and the Yang–Baxter identity for a quasitriangular structure: R satisfies R12R13R23=R23R13R12.

[F3]

Associator naturality, pentagon, unit triangle and symmetry hexagons on elementary tensors: the canonical associators identify parenthesizations on pure tensors and preserve identities and compositions.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2F3algebra

On V⊗3 write T1=τ12R12 and T2=τ23R23. Conjugating a leg operator by an adjacent flip relabels its two tensor positions, so T1T2T1=τ12τ23τ12R23R13R12,T2T1T2=τ23τ12τ23R12R13R23. The two flip products agree on every pure tensor by the permutation braid calculation, and [F2] identifies the R-products, proving the adjacent relation on three factors.

2.1step 1.1F3algebra

For any n≥3 and any adjacent positions i,i+1,i+2, the corresponding three operators are the maps of step 1.1 tensored with identities before and after those positions. Functoriality of tensor maps and the canonical reassociations in [F3] preserve their equality, so TiTi+1Ti=Ti+1TiTi+1 on V⊗n.

3.1givenF1F3algebra∎

If ∣i−j∣>1, then Ti and Tj alter disjoint tensor positions. On each pure tensor, applying them in either order gives the same finite sum because each operator leaves every position used by the other unchanged; linearity extends equality to V⊗n.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources