How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hyperbolicity is transported by a quasi isometry
Statement
Assume AC for the Morse supplier. If f:X→Y is a (λ,ε)-quasi-isometric embedding of geodesic spaces and Y is δ-slim, then X is λ(2M(λ,ε,δ)+δ+ε)-slim. Hence quasi-isometric geodesic spaces share hyperbolicity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed quasi-isometric embedding, with , ; write .
Under AC, Morse stability with explicit parameter dependence gives both Hausdorff inclusions with this , for every specified endpoint geodesic, without continuity or properness.
Under AC, attained coarse density supplies a controlled quasi-isometric inverse by A quasi isometry of geodesic spaces has a controlled coarse inverse.
A quasi-isometry admits a coarse Lipschitz quasi-inverse with both composites at bounded distance from the identities (Coarsely dense subsets, quasi-inverses and quasi-isometries).
AC has the meaning in The Axiom of Choice and is used only through F1 and, for the final converse, F2.
Proof
Fix any geodesic triangle in with vertices , and any point on its specified side . Compose the isometric parametrization of each of the three sides with . The given inequalities make each composition a -quasi-geodesic on a nonempty compact interval, even if is discontinuous. Choose three target endpoint geodesics . F1 applies separately to every one of them.
Fix . The first Hausdorff inclusion gives with . Target slimness gives with . The reverse Hausdorff inclusion on whichever side contains gives with . Hence , and the lower embedding inequality gives Only finitely many approximate witnesses are used; there is no assumption that the image of or of a side has closest points.
Taking the infimum over the other two source sides and then letting decrease to zero proves their distance from is at most . The chosen source triangle, side and point were arbitrary, proving the exact stated slimness constant. Repeated vertices and zero parameters are included: a side can have a one-point interval, and the argument divides only by the positive .
Finally let be a quasi-isometry in F3's convention, with supplied coarse inverse . If has coarse Lipschitz constants and , then Replace by , combine this lower bound for with its coarse Lipschitz upper bound, and enlarge the two constants to obtain some embedding inequalities. The other composite bound gives attained coarse density. F2 therefore supplies a controlled inverse which is a quasi-isometric embedding. If is hyperbolic, step 3.1 applied to proves hyperbolic; if is hyperbolic, apply the same result to to prove hyperbolic. If the spaces are empty, F3 forces both empty and there are no triangles to check. This proves invariance with the stated AC assumption.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Druţu–Kapovich Corollary 9.39 (standard reference, not scraped)