Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Induced blocks have controlled defect

Statement

If a block b of kH has defect group D and bG is defined, then D is contained in a G-conjugate of a defect group of bG. No equality of defect groups is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: HG finite, a splitting residue field k, and the stated induced block B=bG.

[F1]

A block induced from a subgroup gives bResH×HG×GB.

[F2]

Block bimodule has a diagonal vertex supplies a diagonal vertex of B.

[F3]

Mackey, summand extraction and vertex containment are Relative projectivity mackey intersections for finite modules.

[F4]

Defect group and numerical defect of a block identifies a defect group D precisely by vertex ΔD.

Proof

1.1

Choose a defect group E of B by F2 and F4. Relative ΔE-projectivity writes B as a summand of a module induced from ΔE. Restrict it to H×H and apply F3. By F1 and finite summand extraction, b is relatively (H×H)xΔEx1-projective for some xG×G. Since ΔD is a vertex by F4, F3 places it in an (H×H)-conjugate of that intersection, hence in a (G×G)-conjugate of ΔE.

F1F2F3F4algebra
2.1

Write that conjugating element as (g1,g2). Projecting ΔD(g1,g2)ΔE(g1,g2)1 onto the first coordinate gives Dg1Eg11. Conjugating a diagonal vertex simultaneously by (g1,g1) shows this conjugate of E is again a defect group of B. This proves the required containment. If D=1 the conclusion is automatic; if H=G, F1 gives B=b and equality is possible. Neither argument infers equality in general. All selections involve finite subgroup sets and finite decompositions, with no additional AC.

F1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources