How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induced singular chain maps commute with boundaries
Statement
If is continuous, then for every and every abelian group , In degree , both composites from to are the zero map.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous map , an abelian group , and an integer .
The induced map sends a singular simplex to the composite (The induced singular chain map of a continuous map).
The singular boundary is the alternating sum of the affine face restrictions (The singular boundary operator).
Proof
If , then by [L2], so both composites from to are the zero map.
Assume and let be a singular -simplex. By [L1] and [L2], The same formulas give so the two values agree on every singular simplex.
Singular simplices generate , and the coefficient- map is the tensor extension of the integer-coefficient map. Therefore step 1.2 proves the identity for every , while step 1.1 handles degree .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology (standard reference, not scraped)