How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The coordinate-tail and sparse-vector formulations of best s-term error agree
Statement
Let with and , and let use the one-based labels , with label corresponding to library coordinate . For , agrees with off and is zero on . Define . Define using the one-based labels , with label corresponding to library coordinate . Then and this sparse-vector minimum is attained.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A vector , positive integers with , and the coordinate-tail quantity .
Best s-term ℓ1 approximation error: , and the finite nonempty indexing family has a minimizing member.
Laws of finite sums and finite products, clause 4: finite sums preserve termwise inequalities, and a finite sum of nonnegative terms is nonnegative.
Proof
Let be any vector with , and put . For every , , so . For every , . Thus [F2,F3], applied in the original coordinate order, give , where the final inequality follows from [F1] because . Thus every admissible sparse vector has error at least .
By [F1], choose a minimizing set with . Define , equal to on and zero on . Define coordinatewise by for and otherwise. Then , so it is admissible, and direct coordinate summation gives Together with step 1.1 this proves equality and attainment. The proof chooses one witness from a finite nonempty set and uses no choice axiom.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Simon Foucart and Holger Rauhut, A Mathematical Introduction to Compressive Sensing, §2.1 Definition 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Shahar Mendelson, Holger Rauhut, and Rachel Ward, Improved Bounds for Sparse Recovery from Subsampled Random Convolutions, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)