Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-08 (Codex)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An irreducible submodule of a Noetherian module is primary

Statement

Let R be a commutative ring, let M be a Noetherian left R-module, and let Q⊊M be irreducible, meaning that whenever Q=A∩B with submodules A,B⊆M, then Q=A or Q=B. Then Q is primary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, a Noetherian left R-module M, and an irreducible proper submodule Q⊊M.

[L1]

In a short exact sequence, a quotient of a Noetherian module is again Noetherian (Noetherian and Artinian conditions are each exact in short exact sequences).

[L2]

The quotient module M/Q is formed from the cosets of Q (Quotient module M/N with scalar multiplication on additive cosets).

[L3]

A proper submodule is primary exactly when the classical power condition of the previous lemma holds (Primary submodules are exactly quotients with nilpotent zero divisors).

[L4]

If every submodule is finitely generated, every ascending sequence of submodules stabilizes. This implication uses no choice principle (Finite generation, ACC, and maximal-condition characterizations of Noetherian modules, condition 1 implies condition 2).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2givenalgebra

Let N=M/Q. By [L1], the quotient module N is Noetherian. The submodule 0⊂N is irreducible: if 0=A′∩B′ in N, then taking inverse images in M gives Q=A∩B with Q⊆A,B, so the irreducibility of Q forces A=Q or B=Q, hence A′=0 or B′=0.

2.1L4step 1.1choosealgebra

Let x∈R be a zero divisor on N, and write Kk:={y∈N:xky=0}. Since R is commutative, multiplication by xk is R-linear, so Kk and xkN are submodules. Also K1≠0 and Kk⊆Kk+1. By [L4] this ascending sequence stabilizes; choose n≥1 beyond its stabilization index, so Kn=K2n. If z∈Kn∩xnN, write z=xny. Then x2ny=xnz=0, hence y∈K2n=Kn and z=0. Thus 0=Kn∩xnN. This uses only the choice-free implication of [L4].

3.1L2L3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Since 0≠K1⊆Kn, irreducibility of 0⊂N and 0=Kn∩xnN force xnN=0. Consequently, if xm∈Q and m∉Q, the nonzero coset m+Q shows that x is a zero divisor on N, so some n≥1 satisfies xnM⊆Q. By [L3], Q is primary.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1∎

Hence every irreducible submodule of a Noetherian module is primary, without an additional choice assumption.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources