Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite Gaussian water-level allocation

Statement

Let m≥1, let λ1,…,λm≥0, and for 0≤δi≤λi put

ϕi(δi):={12log⁡2(λi/δi),λi>0, 0<δi≤λi,+∞,λi>0, δi=0,0,λi=0, δi=0.

For a total distortion budget D≥0, minimize ∑iϕi(δi) subject to ∑iδi≤D and 0≤δi≤λi. If 0<D<∑iλi, there is a unique θ∈(0,max⁡iλi) satisfying

∑imin⁡(λi,θ)=D,

and the minimum is

12∑ilog⁡2+(λi/θ),δi∗=min⁡(λi,θ),

where log⁡2+(u):=max⁡(0,log⁡2u) for u>0, and log⁡2+(0):=0. If D=0, the minimum is +∞ when some λi>0 and is 0 when all λi=0. If D≥∑iλi, the minimum is 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonempty finite list of nonnegative numbers λi and D≥0.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

Define S(θ)=∑imin⁡(λi,θ) for 0≤θ≤max⁡iλi. It is continuous, S(0)=0, and S(max⁡iλi)=∑iλi. If 0≤θ1<θ2<max⁡iλi, some λj>θ2, so the j-th summand increases strictly and the others do not decrease. Thus for 0<D<∑iλi, the intermediate-value theorem gives a unique θ with S(θ)=D.

1.2givenalgebra

For t>0, ln⁡t≤t−1: if t≥1, integrate 1/u≤1 on [1,t]; if 0<t<1, use ln⁡t=−∫t1du/u and 1/u≥1 on [t,1]. Hence −ln⁡t+t−1≥0.

2.1givenstep 1.2algebra

Fix 0<D<∑iλi, its θ, and c=(2θln⁡2)−1. If λi>θ, then for 0<δi≤λi, ϕi(δi)−ϕi(θ)+c(δi−θ)=−ln⁡(δi/θ)+δi/θ−12ln⁡2≥0 by step 1.2; the inequality also holds at δi=0 because ϕi(0)=+∞. If 0<λi≤θ, then ϕi(λi)=0, and for 0<δi≤λi, step 1.2 gives ϕi(δi)≥1−δi/λi2ln⁡2≥λi−δi2θln⁡2=−c(δi−λi). It holds at δi=0 by the infinite-value convention. A zero eigenvalue has only δi=0 and contributes zero. Thus for every feasible coordinate, ϕi(δi)≥ϕi(δi∗)−c(δi−δi∗), with δi∗=min⁡(λi,θ).

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra

Summing the supporting inequalities in step 2.1 and using ∑iδi≤D=∑iδi∗ proves ∑iϕi(δi)≥∑iϕi(δi∗). The latter sum is exactly 12∑ilog⁡2+(λi/θ); the allocation is feasible, so it attains the minimum.

4.1givenstep 3.1algebra∎

If D=0, nonnegativity forces every δi=0, giving the two stated cases. If D≥∑iλi, choose δi=λi for every i; all rates are zero, and no feasible objective can be negative. These cases complete the endpoint and degenerate branches.

Used by

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources