How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A ring is Jacobson iff every prime ideal is an intersection of maximal ideals containing it
Statement
For a commutative ring , the following are equivalent.
- is Jacobson.
- Every prime ideal equals the intersection of the maximal ideals of that contain .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring .
On this page, the term "Jacobson" is used for the prime-intersection property written in statement 2.
Proof
Statement 1 says that is Jacobson. By [A1], this means exactly the property written in statement 2: every prime ideal is the intersection of the maximal ideals containing it.
Therefore statement 1 implies statement 2 and statement 2 implies statement 1, because the two sentences are literally the same condition written once as terminology and once in expanded form.
Used by
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, v4.03, Definition 15.1 and Proposition 15.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., (15.20) (standard reference, not scraped)