How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unique Laurent decomposition for the Jones–Vassiliev basis
Statement
Let be an invertible indeterminate and put . Every Laurent polynomial has a unique expression with , where is the ring of finite integer-coefficient polynomials in the indeterminate .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The commutative polynomial ring , the monic polynomial , and the Laurent polynomial ring .
The polynomial ring consists of finite-support coefficient sequences with coefficientwise addition and finite convolution multiplication (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).
If is commutative, then with these operations is a commutative ring (Polynomial convolution makes a commutative ring containing as its constant subring).
The ideal generated by is a two-sided ideal; the quotient ring consists of its additive cosets with multiplication induced from (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals, The quotient ring with ).
Division by the monic degree-two polynomial gives each polynomial in a unique remainder of degree less than two (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring).
Proof
Let . By [F1] and [F2], is a commutative polynomial ring, and [F3] makes a two-sided ideal and a quotient ring. Since is monic of degree two, [F4] gives every class in a representative of degree at most one in . If two such representatives define the same class, their difference is a multiple of and has degree less than two; uniqueness in [F4] forces the difference to be zero. Thus this representative is unique.
Define on finite polynomials by . Substitution and finite convolution make a ring homomorphism, and , so is constant on cosets of and induces . In , , so is a unit with inverse . Define by ; because , finite Laurent multiplication is preserved. The composite fixes , while fixes and ; since is generated by and , the maps are inverse. The unique representatives from step 1.1 therefore give the asserted unique Laurent decomposition.
Depends on
- The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution
- Polynomial convolution makes $R[x]$ a commutative ring containing $R$ as its constant subring
- The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals
- The quotient ring $R/I$ with $(r+I)(s+I)=rs+I$
- Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Avishy Carmi and Eliahu Cohen, On trivial Jones–Vassiliev polynomials, arXiv:2606.22410v1, Lemma 3.1 and Appendix B.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Neil Donaldson, Math 120B Notes, Section 22 (standard reference, not scraped)