Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unique Laurent decomposition for the Jones–Vassiliev basis

Statement

Let x be an invertible indeterminate and put p=x−x−1. Every Laurent polynomial P(x)∈Z[x,x−1] has a unique expression P(x)=a(p)+b(p)x with a,b∈Z[p], where Z[p] is the ring of finite integer-coefficient polynomials in the indeterminate p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The commutative polynomial ring R=Z[p], the monic polynomial G(X)=X2−pX−1∈R[X], and the Laurent polynomial ring Z[x,x−1].

[F1]

The polynomial ring R[X] consists of finite-support coefficient sequences with coefficientwise addition and finite convolution multiplication (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).

[F2]

If R is commutative, then R[X] with these operations is a commutative ring (Polynomial convolution makes R[x] a commutative ring containing R as its constant subring).

[F3]

The ideal generated by G is a two-sided ideal; the quotient ring consists of its additive cosets with multiplication induced from R[X] (The ideal generated by a subset and principal ideals, The quotient ring R/I with (r+I)(s+I)=rs+I).

[F4]

Division by the monic degree-two polynomial G gives each polynomial in R[X] a unique remainder of degree less than two (Division by a monic polynomial over a commutative ring).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3F4construct

Let Q=R[X]/(G). By [F1] and [F2], R[X] is a commutative polynomial ring, and [F3] makes (G) a two-sided ideal and Q a quotient ring. Since G is monic of degree two, [F4] gives every class in Q a representative a(p)+b(p)X of degree at most one in X. If two such representatives define the same class, their difference is a multiple of G and has degree less than two; uniqueness in [F4] forces the difference to be zero. Thus this representative is unique.

2.1givenF1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

Define ϕ:R[X]→Z[x,x−1] on finite polynomials by ϕ(∑jcj(p)Xj)=∑jcj(x−x−1)xj. Substitution and finite convolution make ϕ a ring homomorphism, and ϕ(G)=x2−(x−x−1)x−1=0, so ϕ is constant on cosets of (G) and induces ϕˉ:Q→Z[x,x−1]. In Q, X(X−p)=1, so X is a unit with inverse X−p. Define ψ:Z[x,x−1]→Q by ψ(∑knkxk)=∑k≥0nkXk+∑k<0nk(X−p)−k; because X−p=X−1, finite Laurent multiplication is preserved. The composite ϕˉψ fixes x, while ψϕˉ fixes X and p; since Q is generated by X and p, the maps are inverse. The unique representatives from step 1.1 therefore give the asserted unique Laurent decomposition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources