How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Jordan-quiver categories are abelian; finite-field models are finitary
Statement
For every field , the category of Nilpotent representations of the Jordan quiver is abelian, and its subobjects are exactly the -invariant subspaces of each object . When is finite, is small and its Hom sets and Yoneda sets are finite. Thus it satisfies the finitary hypotheses of Small finitary abelian categories for Hall multiplication.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and the category ; when is finite, two fixed objects for the extension-count argument.
Objects are finite-dimensional vector spaces with nilpotent endomorphisms; morphisms are the intertwining linear maps satisfying (Nilpotent representations of the Jordan quiver).
Finitary means that the category is small or is supplied with a small skeleton and that Hom and Yoneda sets are finite (Small finitary abelian categories for Hall multiplication).
An abelian category is additive, has kernels and cokernels, and its canonical coimage-to-image maps are isomorphisms (Abelian category).
Here a monomorphism is a morphism cancellable on the left.
A subobject is a mutual-factorisation class of monomorphisms into its target (Small finitary abelian categories for Hall multiplication).
Proof
Fix a morphism intertwining two nilpotent endomorphisms. Its kernel and image are invariant, and the induced endomorphism on its cokernel is nilpotent. Intertwining maps are closed under addition, composition is bilinear, and the ordinary finite direct sums with diagonal endomorphisms and the zero object have their vector-space biproduct universal properties. Choose bases for the kernel, image, and cokernel of this one map and transport them to standard objects; their universal properties are preserved. The coimage-to-image isomorphism is an intertwiner because commutes with the endomorphisms. This verifies the abelian-category clauses in [F3].
For any field , the standard-coordinate objects and matrices between them form sets, since they are a union indexed by pairs of natural numbers of sets of matrices over ; hence is small. If is finite, there are finitely many matrices of each size, and each Hom set is a subset of a finite set of matrices, so Hom sets are finite.
Now suppose is finite and fix objects and . In a short exact sequence , the middle space has dimension . After identifying it with , only finitely many nilpotent matrices and endpoint maps are possible. Thus the set of such sequences, and its quotient by Yoneda equivalence, are finite.
A monic intertwiner is injective: if has a nonzero kernel vector , the source nilpotent operator preserves . Choose the least with ; then is nonzero, lies in the kernel, and satisfies . The map sending to is nonzero and intertwines, but its composite with is zero, contradicting left cancellation [F4]. Conversely, every injective intertwiner is monic by linear injectivity.
By step 1.4, every monomorphism identifies its domain with an invariant subspace of its target. Conversely, every invariant subspace carries the restricted nilpotent endomorphism; choosing a basis for this single finite-dimensional subspace and transporting the endomorphism to represents its inclusion by a monic map in the standard-coordinate model. Two such monic maps have the same image exactly when they mutually factor: maps with the same image are related by the induced intertwining isomorphism of their domains, and mutual factorisation forces both image inclusions. By [F5], this is precisely equality of subobject classes.
The category is abelian by step 1.1 and small by step 1.2. For finite , its Hom and Yoneda extension sets are finite by steps 1.2 and 1.3, exactly the finitary conditions in [F2]; step 2.1 proves the stated subobject description for every field.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Olivier Schiffmann, Lectures on Hall Algebras, arXiv:math/0611617v2, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Matthew B. Young, Degenerate versions of Green’s theorem for Hall modules, arXiv:1810.08238v2, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)