Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Deep derived relations preserve finite mixed-coefficient quotients

Statement

Let r≥0, let G be a group, and let N◃G satisfy N⊆G(r), where G(0)=G and G(i+1)=[G(i),G(i)]. Put H=G/N and let q:G→H be the quotient. Supply a finite list of commutative unital rings R0,…,Rr−1. For a group L define, through index r, P0L=L,Pi+1L=ker⁡ ⁣(PiL⟶(PiL/[PiL,PiL])⊗ZRi). The tensor map sends an abelianized class a to a⊗1. Then for 0≤i≤r, N⊆PiG and the restriction of q induces PiG/N≅PiH,G/PiG≅H/PiH. For 0≤i<r it also induces PiG/Pi+1G≅PiH/Pi+1H. These are the actual natural quotient maps. Every PiL is characteristic in L and contains L(i). The same q induces G/G(r)≅H/H(r). If all Ri=Q, then G/PrG is PTFA. A final choice Ri=Fp is allowed in the quotient conclusions, but no PTFA assertion is made for such a series. No choice axiom is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The group, normal subgroup, integer and finite ring list in the Statement. A commutator subgroup means the subgroup of finite products of commutators and their inverses; all uses below are on such finite words. Tensor products are the abelian groups generated by pairs modulo the additive and balancing relations.

Proof

1.1givenconstructalgebra

Each Pi+1L is a subgroup of PiL. An automorphism of L preserves PiL inductively, and induces an automorphism of its abelianization and of the displayed tensor group; their maps commute with a↦a⊗1. Its kernel is therefore preserved, proving that all PiL are characteristic and in particular normal. Also L(i)⊆PiL by induction: the assertion is equality at zero, and commutators of elements of L(i) lie in [PiL,PiL], which maps to zero under abelianization and hence lies in Pi+1L. Derived subgroups are descending by their finite commutator definition. Consequently N⊆G(r)⊆G(i)⊆PiG for every i≤r.

2.1step 1.1constructalgebra

We prove PiH=q(PiG) through index r. It holds at zero. Suppose it holds at i<r and put A=PiG. The restriction q:A→PiH is onto with kernel N. Moreover N⊆G(r)⊆G(i+1)=[G(i),G(i)]⊆[A,A]. The abelianization of A/N is A/[A,A]: expanding commutators shows [A/N,A/N]=[A,A]/N, since every finite commutator word in the quotient lifts by finitely many individual lifts. Thus the induced abelianization map is an isomorphism. Tensoring this isomorphism with Ri is an isomorphism too, because tensoring its inverse gives an inverse on every generator a⊗u; exactness of tensor is not being assumed. The two maps to these isomorphic tensor groups commute with q. Their kernels consequently satisfy Pi+1H=q(Pi+1G): a fixed element of the former has a lift in A, and its tensor value is zero by the isomorphism, hence that lift is in Pi+1G. This proves the finite induction.

3.1givenstep 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

The kernel of each restricted q:PiG→PiH is N, already contained in PiG by step 1.1, proving the first displayed isomorphism. The preimage of PiH=q(PiG) is PiG, since it already contains N; this proves the second. Similarly the preimage in PiG of Pi+1H is Pi+1G, giving the successive-quotient isomorphisms. For ordinary derived subgroups, expanding commutators and lifting each finite commutator word proves inductively q(G(i))=H(i). Since N⊆G(r), the same preimage argument gives G/G(r)≅H/H(r). None of these conclusions follows merely from characteristicness: their actual kernels and preimages have been identified.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1constructalgebra∎

When all Ri=Q, each quotient PiG/Pi+1G embeds, by the kernel definition, in the additive group (PiG/[PiG,PiG])⊗ZQ. That group is a rational vector space by scalar multiplication on the second tensor coordinate, so its additive group is torsion-free abelian: multiplication by a nonzero integer has inverse multiplication by its reciprocal. The finite normal series G/PrG ⊵ P1G/PrG ⊵⋯⊵ PrG/PrG=1 therefore has torsion-free abelian factors and is precisely a PTFA series, with trivial factors permitted. For r=0 the quotient is trivial and the series is empty. For other ring lists steps 1.1–3.1 are unchanged, but a positive-characteristic tensor group can have additive torsion, so this last PTFA argument is intentionally not asserted. Every lift above concerned one finite word or one individual quotient element; no infinite set of representatives or vector-space basis was selected. This proves the full natural quotient assertions without a choice principle.

Used by

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources