Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-12
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kolmogorov atomic kernel maxima

Statement

Assume AC. For every integer n≥4 there are tj∈((j−1)/n,j/n), 1≤j≤n, such that 1,t1,…,tn are rationally independent and, for BL(x)=n−1∑j=1nDL(x−tj), sup⁡L≥1∣BL(x)∣≥clog⁡n almost everywhere on T. One may take c=1/(4π), with the natural logarithm. In particular such n are arbitrarily large.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Rationally independent phases with the constant one admit simultaneous approximation at positive integer times Kolmogorov simultaneous phase approximation.

[F2]

Off the integers, DL(y)=sin⁡((2L+1)πy)/sin⁡(πy) Closed form and size bounds for the Dirichlet kernel.

[F3]

Countable subsets of the real line are Lebesgue null under countable choice Every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null; in particular λ1(Q)=0.

[F4]

Proof

Given: An integer n≥4 and AC.

1.1F3F4

At step j, the rational linear span of 1,t1,…,tj−1 is countable: enumerate rational tuples by listing integer numerators and positive denominators of bounded absolute size, then increase the bound; evaluate each tuple. F3 makes this span null. The open cell ((j−1)/n,j/n) has measure 1/n>0, so contains a point tj outside the span. Finite induction chooses these points and proves their independence. Let V be their full rational linear span with one; the same enumeration makes V countable and null. AC supplies the countable-choice measure hypotheses in F3; selecting this fixed finite tuple adds no arbitrary-index choice.

2.1step 1.1

Fix x∈[0,1)∖V and write yj=x−tj. If q0+∑jqjyj=0 for rational coefficients, put q=∑jqj. If q=0, independence of 1,t1,…,tn forces all coefficients zero. If q≠0, the equation puts x=(∑jqjtj−q0)/q in V, impossible. Thus 1,y1,…,yn are independent, and none of the yj is an integer.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

Set zj=ie−πiyjsgn⁡(sin⁡(πyj)), which has modulus one. Apply F1 with error 1/2 to obtain L≥1. Multiplying the approximation by eπiyjsgn⁡(sin⁡(πyj)) shows ∣e(2L+1)πiyjsgn⁡(sin⁡(πyj))−i∣<1/2. Its imaginary part exceeds 1/2, hence F2 gives DL(yj)>1/(2∣sin⁡(πyj)∣)≥1/(2π∣yj∣). All terms have the same positive sign; there is no cancellation in their average.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Let k∈{1,…,n} be the cell index with (k−1)/n≤x<k/n. Cell placement implies ∣x−tj∣≤(∣j−k∣+1)/n. At least one side from k to an endpoint contains m+1≥n/2 indices with distances ℓ=0,…,m. Therefore n−1∑j∣x−tj∣−1≥∑ℓ=0m(ℓ+1)−1≥log⁡(m+2)≥log⁡(n/2)≥(log⁡n)/2. The harmonic bound follows by integrating 1/t over each [ℓ+1,ℓ+2], where it is at most 1/(ℓ+1). Step 3.1 now gives BL(x)>(log⁡n)/(4π). This holds off the single countable null set V, proving the assertion with the stated uniform constant. Grid endpoints are covered by the half-open choice of k; singular points tj were excluded in step 2.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources