How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kolmogorov atomic kernel maxima
Statement
Assume AC. For every integer there are , , such that are rationally independent and, for , almost everywhere on . One may take , with the natural logarithm. In particular such are arbitrarily large.
Facts & Assumptions
Rationally independent phases with the constant one admit simultaneous approximation at positive integer times Kolmogorov simultaneous phase approximation.
Off the integers, Closed form and size bounds for the Dirichlet kernel.
Countable subsets of the real line are Lebesgue null under countable choice Every at most countable subset of is Lebesgue null; in particular .
Assume AC The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
Given: An integer and AC.
At step , the rational linear span of is countable: enumerate rational tuples by listing integer numerators and positive denominators of bounded absolute size, then increase the bound; evaluate each tuple. F3 makes this span null. The open cell has measure , so contains a point outside the span. Finite induction chooses these points and proves their independence. Let be their full rational linear span with one; the same enumeration makes countable and null. AC supplies the countable-choice measure hypotheses in F3; selecting this fixed finite tuple adds no arbitrary-index choice.
Fix and write . If for rational coefficients, put . If , independence of forces all coefficients zero. If , the equation puts in , impossible. Thus are independent, and none of the is an integer.
Set , which has modulus one. Apply F1 with error to obtain . Multiplying the approximation by shows . Its imaginary part exceeds , hence F2 gives . All terms have the same positive sign; there is no cancellation in their average.
Let be the cell index with . Cell placement implies . At least one side from to an endpoint contains indices with distances . Therefore . The harmonic bound follows by integrating over each , where it is at most . Step 3.1 now gives . This holds off the single countable null set , proving the assertion with the stated uniform constant. Grid endpoints are covered by the half-open choice of k; singular points were excluded in step 2.1.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)