How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Laws commute with measurable maps
Statement
Let be a random element, and let be measurable. Then is a random element and for every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A random element and a measurable map as in the Statement.
Composition of measurable maps is measurable (Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability).
The law of a random element is defined by pullback of measurable target sets (Law or distribution of a random element).
The law of any random element is a probability measure (The law of a random element is a probability measure).
Proof
By [L1], the composite is measurable, hence a random element.
For every , Therefore [L2] gives This right-hand side is defined because [L3] makes a probability measure on .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the measurable-map compatibility of laws.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. R. S. Varadhan, Probability Theory, Section 1.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. R. Norris, Probability and Measure, Section 3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)