How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Local GCH absorbs sums and squares
Statement
In ZF, if and , then
Facts & Assumptions
Dedekind infinitude is equivalent to a countable subset: An injected omega gives a bijection .
Local GCH for arbitrary sets: An intermediate size between and its power set equals one endpoint under local GCH.
No injection of a power set into finite sequences: For , its power set does not inject into finite sequences.
The Schröder-Bernstein theorem: Opposite injections yield a bijection in ZF.
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Fix . The two copies of inject into by and . A bijection transports this to . Also .
Local GCH makes equinumerous either with or with . The latter would inject the power set into finite sequences: use for the first copy and for the second. This is impossible. Thus .
The map taking a subset of a tagged disjoint union to its two component subsets is a bijection . Transport along the previous bijection gives . Singleton coordinates inject into this product, while injects into .
Apply local GCH to . The power-set endpoint would inject into length-two sequences, again impossible; the remaining endpoint is . Together with the product-of-powersets bijection this proves all assertions.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Caicedo, Some choiceless results (5), Lemma 1 and proof (standard reference, not scraped)