How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Locality determines the formal OPE coefficients
Statement
Let be mutually local fields on a complex vector space , with locality order . Put and, for , define Then and the coefficients are unique. We use the formal OPE shorthand to record these coefficients: its precise meaning is the commutator expansion above, equivalently the difference of the prescribed expansions and . No analytic convergence is implied. For all integers the modes satisfy Here the binomial coefficient is the generalized integer binomial from Formal distributions and fields on a vector space. If , the sums are empty and the commutator is zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The complex vector space, fields , and locality order .
Formal distributions and fields on a vector space: formal distributions are coefficient families; extracts the coefficient; ; and are the two specified binomial expansions.
Proof
Set . Comparing coefficients gives . Differentiating this identity times in gives for . Also, direct residue extraction gives if and otherwise for : repeated use of the differentiated identity reduces to a positive derivative of , and to a positive power of times .
If , locality says . If , writing , the equation gives . Hence depends only on , so . This is the required expansion for order one.
Assume and that the expansion is proved for order . Since , write by induction. The identity in step 1.1 shows that is killed by , hence is a multiple by step 2.1. This gives a finite delta-derivative expansion for . Taking residues after multiplying by and using the residue calculation in step 1.1 identifies its th coefficient as and proves uniqueness.
The geometric-series identity follows by writing the first expansion in nonnegative powers of and the second in nonnegative powers of . Differentiating times gives . Substitution in step 2.2 yields the stated singular OPE coefficients and fixes both expansion conventions.
Since , differentiation gives for every integer . Apply to step 2.2. The result is . The sum is finite; the case was handled in step 2.1.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Christophe Nozaradan, Introduction to Vertex Algebras, §§1.4 and 3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tomoyuki Arakawa and Anne Moreau, Arc spaces and vertex algebras, §§2.2–2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)