How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Logistic and exponential losses satisfy the tight-tail condition
Statement
For and , the negative derivatives and have tight exponential tails with and in the definition of a tight exponential tail.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The loss functions and .
Tight exponential tail for a positive loss derivative: it suffices to bound above by and below by for every .
Proof
The exponential loss has . For , , so , which is exactly the pair of bounds in [F1].
The logistic loss has . For , because and . Multiplying by gives for , as required by [F1].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Daniel Soudry et al., The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Data, Definition 2 and §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Matus Telgarsky, Deep Learning Theory lecture notes, §10.2 (standard reference, not scraped)