How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Computable many-one reducibility is reflexive and transitive
Statement
Computable many-one reducibility is reflexive and transitive: every language satisfies , and whenever and , one also has .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Languages over finite alphabets.
A computable many-one reduction is a total computable function preserving membership in both directions, by Computable many-one reductions between languages.
Proof
For reflexivity, use the identity map on 's alphabet. It is total and computable, and for every , so [L1] gives .
For transitivity, let witness and let witness . By [L1], both maps are total and computable, so is total and computable as well.
For every , [L1] gives . Thus , so [L1] yields .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- MIT 6.045J / 18.400J, Lecture 9: Mapping Reducibility and Rice's Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kevin Kelly, Many-one Reduction (standard reference, not scraped)