How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A maximal regular sequence stops at an associated prime
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
Let be Noetherian, let be finite, let be an ideal, and let be an -regular sequence in . Put and assume . Then is maximal among regular sequences in if and only if for some .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice and the data and terminal quotient in the statement.
Under Choice, depth zero of a nonzero finite module with is equivalent to lying in an associated prime (Depth zero and associated primes).
Proof
The sequence can be extended in exactly when contains a nonzerodivisor on whose quotient is nonzero. If such an element had , then , contrary to .
Thus maximality is equivalent to . By [L1], this is exactly the displayed containment.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Depth and Cohen--Macaulay modules source treatment (standard reference, not scraped)