Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Green identity and Kirchhoff flux cancellation on a metric graph

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Orient each edge coordinate from 0 at ∂−e to ℓe at ∂+e. For endpoint incidences (e,−) and (e,+) define the outward derivatives by ∂ν(e,−)ue=−ue′(0) and ∂ν(e,+)ue=+ue′(ℓe). The two incidences are both included at a loop vertex. For ι=(e,±) write e(ι)=e. If ue∈H2(0,ℓe), with H2 as defined by Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, v∈VD, and each edge has a constant diffusivity κe>0, then

∑e∈Eκe∫0ℓeue′ve′ dxe=−∑e∈Eκe∫0ℓeue′′ve dxe+∑z∈Vv(z)∑ι∈I(z)κe(ι)∂νιue(ι)(z).

Thus zero test traces remove anchored endpoint terms, and a Kirchhoff condition ∑ι∈I(z)κe(ι)∂νιue(ι)(z)=0 at each free vertex cancels the remaining terms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a finite metric graph, edge diffusivities κe>0, edgewise ue∈H2(0,ℓe), and a trace-matching test function v∈VD.

[F1]

Functions in H1 on a finite interval have absolutely continuous representatives extending to both endpoints, with derivative equal almost everywhere to the weak derivative; the two endpoint incidences of a loop are still distinct before trace matching (One-dimensional W1,p functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives).

[F2]

A real-valued absolutely continuous function equals its initial value plus the integral of its almost-everywhere derivative (Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions).

[F4]

Membership in H2(0,ℓe) means ue,ue′∈H1(0,ℓe) and ue′′ is the second weak derivative (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[A1]

The representative theorem in [F1] assumes the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

Given: The oriented intervals, outward derivative convention, edge diffusivities, and edge functions specified in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4givenalgebra

If E=∅, both sides are empty sums and the identity is 0=0. Otherwise fix an edge e and first suppose ue is real-valued. By [F1] and [F4], ue′ and ve have absolutely continuous representatives on [0,ℓe]. They are bounded there. The product ue′ve is absolutely continuous: for any disjoint intervals [aj,bj], ∑j∣ue′(bj)ve(bj)−ue′(aj)ve(aj)∣≤∥ue′∥∞∑j∣ve(bj)−ve(aj)∣+∥ve∥∞∑j∣ue′(bj)−ue′(aj)∣, so the defining absolute-continuity condition follows from that of the two factors. At almost every point both derivatives exist, and [F3] gives (ue′ve)′=ue′′ve+ue′ve′. Both terms are integrable because ue′′,ve′ are integrable derivatives of absolutely continuous functions and ue′,ve are bounded. Applying [F2] to the product therefore yields ∫0ℓeue′ve′ dxe=−∫0ℓeue′′ve dxe+ue′(ℓe)ve(ℓe)−ue′(0)ve(0). If ue is complex-valued, write the absolutely continuous representative ue′=p+iq. By [F1], p,q are real absolutely continuous functions with derivatives Re⁡ue′′,Im⁡ue′′ almost everywhere; these derivatives lie in L2 since their absolute values are bounded by ∣ue′′∣. The test function ve is real by definition of VD. Apply the preceding product-rule and fundamental-theorem calculation separately to pve and qve and combine the two identities, using componentwise complex integration. This proves the same displayed identity for complex ue. The endpoint terms are the head and tail outward derivatives paired with their traces.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra∎

Multiply the identity of step 1.1 by κe and sum over the finite edge set. At each vertex, all endpoint-incidence values of v equal the common trace v(z) by definition of VD; this includes both incidences of a loop. Regrouping the finite endpoint sum by vertices gives the displayed identity. If z∈D, then v(z)=0; if z∉D, the stated Kirchhoff sum is zero. Hence the boundary contribution vanishes under those conditions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources