How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Discrete Kruzhkov inequality for a monotone finite-volume scheme
Statement
Let be a scheme from Monotone finite-volume scheme and invariant-interval CFL, satisfying the full invariant-interval CFL bound. For define where is the Kruzhkov entropy flux of Kruzhkov entropy solutions. Then for every , and for every , and ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The full-line finite-volume recurrence with monotone consistent flux , invariant interval , the full invariant-interval CFL bound, and an arbitrary entropy level .
The update is ; is coordinatewise nondecreasing on and for (Monotone finite-volume scheme and invariant-interval CFL, Invariant range, TVD and time increments for a monotone finite-volume update).
Consistency gives , and the Kruzhkov flux is with (Monotone finite-volume scheme and invariant-interval CFL, Kruzhkov entropy solutions).
Proof
If , then and , so . If , then and , so .
First suppose . Put and let and be its coordinatewise maximum and minimum with . Both triples lie in . By [F1], the two numbers and lie between and ; therefore Expanding the definition of , the right side is which gives the claimed inequality after rearrangement.
If , every state is above by the range assertion in [F1]. Then and for state pairs; substituting the scheme recurrence makes the displayed left side zero. If , every state is below , so and ; substitution again gives zero. The cases and are already covered by step 2.1.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jérôme Droniou, A beginner’s course in finite volume approximation of scalar conservation laws, complete lecture note (standard reference, not scraped)
- Siddhartha Mishra, Ulrik S. Fjordholm and Rémi Abgrall, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, ETH lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)