Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Multilinearization preserves Boolean values and bounds individual degree

Statement

Let F be a field and RXi the reduction of Multilinearization in one variable.

  1. For every P∈F[X1,…,Xm] and b∈{0,1}, (RXiP)∣Xi=b=P∣Xi=b. Consequently, if P agrees with a function on the Boolean cube at every Boolean point, then so does RXiP.
  2. RXiP has degree at most one in Xi, and degree in every other variable at most that of P there.
  3. Let Φ=Q1x1⋯Qnxnψ be a closed prenex quantified Boolean formula whose quantifier-free matrix ψ has L syntax nodes, let b=Pψ and D:=max⁡(L,2), and let P(j) and Mj be the polynomials of the multilinearized ordered arithmetization. Then each P(j) with j≤n−1 has individual degree at most 2 in each of x1,…,xj, each Mj is multilinear in x1,…,xj, and every node polynomial of the operator list, after substituting arbitrary field elements for all variables other than its active variable, has degree at most D in that active variable. The operator list has T=n(n+3)/2=O(n2) entries.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, a polynomial P over it, and a closed prenex quantified Boolean formula Φ with quantifier-free matrix ψ of L syntax nodes.

[A1]

Multilinearization is RXiP=(1−Xi)P∣Xi=0+XiP∣Xi=1; the operator list of Φ runs, for j=n down to 1 through the blocks RX1,…,RXj,Oj, and has T=n(n+1)/2+n entries (Multilinearization in one variable).

[A2]

The matrix arithmetization b=Pψ is built by the gate rules of Arithmetization of Boolean formulas, and Oj is AXj or EXj according to Qj (Field arithmetization of QBF quantifiers).

[L1]

If φ is a formula with s≥1 syntax nodes in which ti leaves are labelled Xi, then Pφ has individual degree at most ti in Xi, hence at most s; and Pφ can be evaluated at a supplied point in O(s) field operations (Formula degree and point-evaluation cost).

[L2]

Write pb=p∣Xi=b. If deg⁡Xjp≤dj for j≠i, then p0+p1 has bound dj in Xj, while p0p1 and p0+p1−p0p1 have bound 2dj (Degree under Boolean elimination operators).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Substituting Xi=0 in the right side of [A1] leaves P∣Xi=0 and substituting Xi=1 leaves P∣Xi=1. The coefficient of Xi is P∣Xi=1−P∣Xi=0, so the Xi-degree is at most one; specialization, multiplication by 1−Xi or by Xi, and addition do not raise the degrees in the other variables. This proves claims (1) and (2), including for constant and zero polynomials.

A1algebra
2.1

If P agrees with a function g at every Boolean point, then at each Boolean point the value of RXiP is the value of P at the same point by step 1.1 and hence equals g there. So RXiP also agrees with g on the Boolean cube, whichever bits g takes.

step 1.1given
2.2

By [L1] the matrix arithmetization b=Pψ has individual degree at most L in every variable. Let 1≤j≤n and suppose P(j) has individual degree at most 2 in x1,…,xj when j≤n−1. By step 1.1 the reductions of the block j do not increase degrees in xj+1,…,xn and make each of x1,…,xj have degree at most one, so Mj is multilinear in x1,…,xj and its individual degrees in xj+1,…,xn are at most those of P(j).

L1A1A2step 1.1
3.1

Applying Oj specializes Mj at Xj=0 and Xj=1 and multiplies or combines the two results, so [L2] gives P(j−1) individual degree at most twice that of Mj in each remaining variable. At j=n the polynomial P(n−1) has individual degree at most 2 in x1,…,xn−1, because Mn is multilinear; inductively the same bound holds at every level j≤n−1.

L2step 2.2algebra
4.1

For the degree of a node polynomial in its active variable, consider the blocks in turn. The reductions of the first block act on b and on its successive reductions; repeated use of claim (2) of step 1.1 shows that the input polynomial of the reduction RXi in that block has Xi-degree at most that of b, namely at most L. Every later reduction acts on some P(j) with j≤n−1, whose individual degrees are at most 2 by step 3.1, and the quantifier node Oj acts on the multilinear Mj, of Xj-degree at most one. Substituting arbitrary field elements for the other variables cannot raise any of these degrees, so every node polynomial specializes to a univariate of degree at most D=max⁡(L,2).

step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1L1algebra
5.1

The operator list consists of ∑j=1nj=n(n+1)/2 reductions and n quantifier operators, so T=n(n+3)/2, which is O(n2); for n=0 the list is empty and all degree assertions are vacuous.

A1step 4.1algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources