How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Piola divergence and facet-flux identities
Statement
Let be as in Contravariant Piola map, and let . Set . Then
For each facet mapped to , with the corresponding oriented normals, the integrated flux is preserved:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An orientation-preserving affine bijection with matrix , determinant , a smooth reference vector field , and its contravariant Piola push-forward.
The push-forward is . (Contravariant Piola map)
The chain rule for total derivatives states for differentiable maps between finite-dimensional real spaces. (The chain rule for total derivatives: )
Proof
Write . The chain rule [F2] for gives ; since is constant, summing the derivatives gives The middle equality uses .
Choose oriented tangent vectors on . Under the tangent vectors are ; multilinearity of the determinant gives the oriented area-normal transformation . Since is invertible, . Therefore the Piola flux element satisfies Integrating over the corresponding facets proves the flux identity.
Commuting diagram
For smooth fields, the proved identity is represented by
diagram failed to render:
C^1(\overline{\widehat K};\mathbb R^d) \arrow[r,"\operatorname{div}"] \arrow[d,"\mathcal P_K"'] & C(\widehat K) \arrow[d,"J_K^{-1}(\cdot)\circ F_K^{-1}"] \\
C^1(\overline K;\mathbb R^d) \arrow[r,"\operatorname{div}"'] & C(K)The top and bottom arrows are divergence, the left arrow is the contravariant Piola push-forward, and the right arrow is scalar pull-forward with the Jacobian factor. The proof above establishes the commutation algebraically; the diagram is only a record of the identity.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2025, Part III Chapter 14: H(div) finite elements (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniele Boffi, Franco Brezzi and Michel Fortin, Mixed Finite Element Methods and Applications (standard reference, not scraped)