Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Piola divergence and facet-flux identities

Statement

Let FK(x^)=AKx^+bK be as in Contravariant Piola map, and let v^∈C1(K^‾;Rd). Set v=PKv^. Then

(div⁡xv)(FK(x^))=JK−1div⁡x^v^(x^).

For each facet F^ mapped to F, with the corresponding oriented normals, the integrated flux is preserved:

∫Fv⋅nF ds=∫F^v^⋅n^F^ ds^.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An orientation-preserving affine bijection FK with matrix AK, determinant JK>0, a smooth reference vector field v^, and its contravariant Piola push-forward.

[F1]

The push-forward is v(FK(x^))=JK−1AKv^(x^). (Contravariant Piola map)

[F2]

The chain rule for total derivatives states D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a) for differentiable maps between finite-dimensional real spaces. (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a))

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

Write vi(FK(x^))=JK−1∑j(AK)ijv^j(x^). The chain rule [F2] for FK−1 gives ∂xi=∑k(AK−1)ki∂x^k; since AK is constant, summing the derivatives gives (div⁡xv)∘FK=JK−1∑i,k,j(AK−1)ki(AK)ij∂x^kv^j=JK−1∑j∂x^jv^j. The middle equality uses AK−1AK=I.

2.1F1F2constructalgebra∎

Choose oriented tangent vectors t^1,…,t^d−1 on F^. Under FK the tangent vectors are AKt^i; multilinearity of the determinant gives the oriented area-normal transformation nFds=cof⁡(AK)n^F^ds^. Since AK is invertible, cof⁡(AK)=JKAK−T. Therefore the Piola flux element satisfies v⋅nF ds=(JK−1AKv^)⋅(JKAK−Tn^F^) ds^=v^⋅n^F^ ds^. Integrating over the corresponding facets proves the flux identity.

Commuting diagram

For smooth fields, the proved identity is represented by

diagram failed to render:
C^1(\overline{\widehat K};\mathbb R^d) \arrow[r,"\operatorname{div}"] \arrow[d,"\mathcal P_K"'] & C(\widehat K) \arrow[d,"J_K^{-1}(\cdot)\circ F_K^{-1}"] \\
C^1(\overline K;\mathbb R^d) \arrow[r,"\operatorname{div}"'] & C(K)

The top and bottom arrows are divergence, the left arrow is the contravariant Piola push-forward, and the right arrow is scalar pull-forward with the Jacobian factor. The proof above establishes the commutation algebraically; the diagram is only a record of the identity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources