How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Remez alternation linear system has a unique solution
Statement
Let , let with , let be any function, and let be distinct nodes in . There is a unique pair satisfying
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , with , a real function defined at the nodes, and ordered distinct nodes in .
Alternating polynomial signs force the Haar zero-count contradiction: a nonzero polynomial of degree at most cannot take nonzero alternating signs at ordered real nodes.
Rank-nullity: : for a linear map between finite-dimensional vector spaces, the domain dimension is the sum of its kernel dimension and image dimension.
Best uniform polynomial error on a compact interval: is the space of restrictions to of real polynomials of degree at most .
Formal real polynomials, evaluation, degree, leading coefficient, and monic polynomials: every real polynomial of degree at most is represented by a coefficient sum .
A nonzero real polynomial of degree has no more than distinct real roots: a nonzero real polynomial of degree at most has at most distinct real roots.
Proof
Define the linear map by . Choose a polynomial representative of using [F3] and [F4]. If and , then vanishes at all distinct nodes, so [F5] forces and hence . If , then are nonzero alternating values, so is nonzero and [F1] rules this out. Thus .
The restrictions of span by [F3] and [F4]. If a linear combination of them restricts to zero on , its representing polynomial vanishes at . These are distinct roots, so [F5] makes that polynomial zero; the coefficient representation then makes every coefficient zero. Thus the restrictions are linearly independent and form a basis, so . Therefore is a basis of the domain, while the standard coordinate vectors form a basis of the codomain; both dimensions are . By [F2] and step 1.1, has image dimension and is therefore bijective. Its equation has exactly one solution.
Depends on
- Best uniform polynomial error on a compact interval
- Formal real polynomials, evaluation, degree, leading coefficient, and monic polynomials
- Alternating polynomial signs force the Haar zero-count contradiction
- A nonzero real polynomial of degree $n$ has no more than $n$ distinct real roots
- Rank-nullity: $\dim_F V=\operatorname{nullity}T+\operatorname{rank}T$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ricardo Pachón and Lloyd N. Trefethen, Barycentric-Remez Algorithms for Best Polynomial Approximation in the Chebfun System, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lloyd N. Trefethen, Approximation Theory and Approximation Practice, Chapter 10 (standard reference, not scraped)