Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Noetherian fibrewise flatness for a module finite over the target

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let R→S→S′ be local homomorphisms of Noetherian local rings, and let M be a finite S′-module. Write m for the maximal ideal of R. If M is flat over R and M/mM is flat over S/mS, then M is flat over S. The conclusion also holds when M=0. No finiteness of M over R or S is assumed.

This is the module-flatness conclusion of Stacks Lemma 10.99.15; its additional conclusion that S is flat over R is not needed here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Noetherian local tower, finite target module, and two flatness hypotheses.

[F1]

Flatness over R makes the multiplication map m⊗RM→M injective (Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests).

[F2]

If S→S′ is a local Noetherian map, M is finite over S′, I⊊S, M/IM is flat over S/I, and I⊗SM→M is injective, then M is flat over S (Local flatness criterion for a module finite over a larger Noetherian local algebra).

Proof

technique · transfer the ideal-tensor injection along the middle ring, then apply the finite-over-target local criterion
1.1F1

Set I=mS⊊S. For any S-module M, there is a natural surjection m⊗RM⟶I⊗SM. Indeed I is generated as an S-module by images of elements of m; a pure tensor (∑arasa)⊗m with ra∈m, sa∈S is the image of ∑ara⊗sam. This works whether or not M is finite over either smaller ring.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

The composite m⊗RM⟶I⊗SM⟶M is the multiplication map of [F1], hence injective. Since the first arrow is surjective by step 1.1, the second arrow I⊗SM→M is injective. The quotient M/IM is exactly M/mM, flat over S/I=S/mS by hypothesis. Apply [F2] to S→S′ and I to conclude that M is flat over S.

3.1F2step 2.1∎

If M=0, both hypotheses and the conclusion hold, and the same argument applies. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F2]; no additional infinite selection is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources