How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Noetherian fibrewise flatness for a module finite over the target
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be local homomorphisms of Noetherian local rings, and let be a finite -module. Write for the maximal ideal of . If is flat over and is flat over , then is flat over . The conclusion also holds when . No finiteness of over or is assumed.
This is the module-flatness conclusion of Stacks Lemma 10.99.15; its additional conclusion that is flat over is not needed here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Noetherian local tower, finite target module, and two flatness hypotheses.
Flatness over makes the multiplication map injective (Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests).
If is a local Noetherian map, is finite over , , is flat over , and is injective, then is flat over (Local flatness criterion for a module finite over a larger Noetherian local algebra).
Proof
Set . For any -module , there is a natural surjection Indeed is generated as an -module by images of elements of ; a pure tensor with , is the image of . This works whether or not is finite over either smaller ring.
The composite is the multiplication map of [F1], hence injective. Since the first arrow is surjective by step 1.1, the second arrow is injective. The quotient is exactly , flat over by hypothesis. Apply [F2] to and to conclude that is flat over .
If , both hypotheses and the conclusion hold, and the same argument applies. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from [F2]; no additional infinite selection is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Algebra, Lemma 10.99.15 (tag 00MP), Noetherian fibrewise flatness criterion (standard reference, not scraped)