How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The normal closure of a radical extension is again radical
Statement
Let be a finite radical extension. Then the normal closure of is again a radical extension of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A radical tower .
A radical extension is built by adjoining one root of one equation at each step (A radical extension is a tower obtained by adjoining one -th root at each step).
After adjoining one nonzero root of , all the remaining roots are obtained by multiplying by -th roots of unity (After adjoining one nonzero root of , all roots are with , The group of -th roots of unity in a field, and primitive -th roots of unity).
Proof
We induct on the length of the radical tower. For , the extension is , whose normal closure is itself.
Assume , let be the normal closure of , and write
If , then , so the normal closure of is just .
Assume instead that . Because is normal and contains , every -conjugate of lies in . Let be the distinct conjugates of over , and choose roots with . Every -conjugate of is then a nonzero root of some polynomial , so [L1] says it has the form for some . Therefore the normal closure of is exactly
By the induction hypothesis, is radical.
In the case of step 2.2, the field is radical over : adjoin the finitely many one at a time, each by one equation , and then adjoin generators of by roots of . Concatenating that tower with the radical tower for from step 2.3 shows that is radical.
Step 2.1 handles the case . Otherwise step 2.2 identifies the normal closure as , and step 3.1 shows that is radical. Thus the induction closes, so the normal closure of every finite radical extension is radical.
Depends on
- A radical extension is a tower obtained by adjoining one $n$-th root at each step
- After adjoining one nonzero root $\alpha$ of $x^n-a$, all roots are $\zeta\alpha$ with $\zeta^n=1$
- The group $\mu_n(K)$ of $n$-th roots of unity in a field, and primitive $n$-th roots of unity
- Equivalent characterizations of a finite Galois extension
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Ash, Basic Abstract Algebra, Proposition 6.8.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, v5.10, Section 7 (standard reference, not scraped)