How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Successive approximation turns a closure-ball inclusion into an actual preimage
Statement
Assume DC. Let be bounded linear, with Banach. If for some , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: DC and with the displayed closure inclusion.
Proof
Given with , repeatedly use the closure inclusion, after scaling, to choose with and residual of norm . DC licenses this dependent recursive selection.
Boundedness makes continuous by For a linear operator, boundedness, continuity at 0, continuity, and Lipschitz continuity are equivalent, so as the residuals vanish.
Depends on
Used by
- Open mapping theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Buhler--Salamon, Functional Analysis, Lemma 2.10 (standard reference, not scraped)