Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

PBW for countably presented Kac Moody Lie algebras

Statement

Let L be a complex Lie algebra with a supplied finite or countable ordered basis (xi). The products xi1xim with i1im, including 1 for m=0, form a basis of U(L). Consequently LU(L) is injective. For the finite-word graded algebras here, compatible homogeneous bases of subalgebras and quotients can be obtained without AC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A supplied ordered basis and finite expansions of brackets in that basis.

[F1]

The enveloping quotient imposes the bracket relations. (The universal enveloping algebra as a tensor quotient).

Proof

1.1

Replace an adjacent inversion xjxi, j>i, by xixj+[xj,xi], expanding the bracket into basis vectors. On each term order the measure lexicographically by word length and number of inversions. The switched term decreases inversions; every bracket term decreases length. Each replacement has finitely many terms. The finitely branching reduction tree has finite depth: otherwise recursively selecting its first child with arbitrarily deep descendants gives an infinite descending sequence of measures. Thus reduction terminates in ordered words.

F1given
2.1

Two reductions on disjoint pairs commute, including their lower-length terms. The only overlapping pair is zyx with z>y>x. Reducing the length-three terms in the two orders gives respectively xyz+[y,x]z+y[z,x]+[z,y]x and xyz+x[z,y]+[z,x]y+z[y,x]. Their difference is [[y,x],z]+[y,[z,x]]+[[z,y],x] after reducing length-two commutators. This is zero by Jacobi. Those length-two reductions are already unambiguous by induction on length, and this reasoning also holds inside a fixed word context.

step 1.1given
3.1

Induct on the reduction measure to compare any two first reductions: the disjoint case joins exactly, and the overlap difference has zero normal form by step 2.1; all subsequent comparisons involve smaller measures. Linearity then gives a unique normal form N for every finite polynomial. For any words u,v, N(u(xjxixixj[xj,xi])v)=0; the relations with the other order follow by antisymmetry and those with equal indices are zero. Hence N kills the two-sided defining ideal. Conversely each reduction changes a polynomial by an element of that ideal. The ordered-word inclusion and N are inverse maps after taking the quotient. In particular distinct length-one basis vectors remain independent.

F1step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Fix one homogeneous component V. Its spanning finite bracket words inherit a finite or countable enumeration; retaining each first word outside the span of its predecessors gives an ordered basis b0,b1, of V. For a specified subspace WV, put Er=span(b0,,br) and Wr=WEr. These finite-dimensional spaces exhaust W, and dimWrdimWr1 is zero or one. Starting with the empty basis, do nothing when the dimension is unchanged. When it rises at r, finite row reduction gives the unique vrWr whose br-coefficient is 1 and whose coefficients in the previous pivot columns are zero; append vr. Indeed, existence comes from normalizing any element of WrWr1 and eliminating its old pivots, while two such vectors differ by an element of Wr1 with every pivot coefficient zero and hence are equal. Induction now shows that the vectors obtained through stage r form a basis of Wr, so their union is a basis of W. Extend it to a basis of V by scanning the br and retaining the first vectors outside the span already obtained; the images of the added vectors form a quotient basis of V/W. Applying this fixed construction to the supplied countable list of degrees gives compatible homogeneous bases without a family of choices. The same finite-coordinate exhaustion handles a countably spanned ungraded algebra. No basis for an arbitrary unbased vector space is asserted.

step 3.1given

Sources

Source comparison: Kleshchev, local PBW reduction supporting §1.3 and §9.3 (the finite-dimensional PBW theorem is not imported).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

1 result within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources