How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
PDA fragment variables compose
Statement
Let be a PDA that accepts by empty stack.
- If is in the language of and is in the language of , then removes the stack prefix while changing state from to and leaving the remaining stack untouched.
- Conversely, consider a computation starting at , and let be its first configuration whose stack is exactly . Then there are words and a state such that , , and . The two split points are the first moments when and then are exposed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A PDA that accepts by empty stack.
By The PDA fragment variable , means that for every stack suffix one has .
Proof
Assume and , and let be any stack suffix. Then [L1] gives and also . Concatenating these two computations yields .
Conversely, let be the first configuration with stack in a computation starting at . Before that point there is a first configuration whose stack is ; write it as and write , where is the input prefix consumed before it is reached and is consumed between the two first-exposure configurations. The computation therefore contains . Neither segment inspects the suffix before its endpoint. Hence the same transition sequences work above every stack suffix , giving and . By [L1], and .
Therefore fragment computations compose exactly by concatenating the consumed words and, conversely, by splitting at the first moment when the lower stacked symbol is exposed.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean Gallier and Jocelyn Quaintance, Introduction to the Theory of Computation: Some Notes for CIS511 (standard reference, not scraped)