Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pointed flat piecewise linear caps admit saddle-free replacements

Statement

Let Z be a supplied finite parametrized embedded PL three-ball with a nonnegative affine height h, and let Z0 be a convex three-dimensional polytope with an affine height h0. Assume D=h−1(0)∩Z and D0=h0−1(0)∩Z0 are boundary disks. Suppose a supplied PL boundary homeomorphism j:∂Z→∂Z0 preserves height and maps D onto D0. Let Q0 be a vertex of the polygonal face D0. Assume the faces of Z0 other than D0 are partitioned into one triangular side face G0 meeting D0 exactly at Q0, a top face T0 at positive constant height, and the remaining side faces. Put Q=j−1(Q0).

For some arbitrarily short positive height range there is a parametrized PL disk A⊂∂Z containing D, meeting j−1(G0) exactly at Q, and a parametrized PL disk A′⊂Z with A∩A′=∂A=∂A′, such that A∪A′ bounds a supplied parametrized PL three-ball. On the boundary obtained by replacing A by A′, every new interior point away from Q has a regular local height-product chart; no positive-height saddle is introduced. The new cap meets height zero exactly at Q. Consequently, whenever the replaced disk lies in an embedded PL sphere whose remaining disk misses the constructed ball except along the common boundary, and the sphere after replacement bounds a supplied PL ball, the original sphere also bounds one. No choice hypothesis is introduced.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two balls, heights, boundary height-preserving map, bottom disks, side triangle and top face as stated.

[F1]

Compatible finite triangulations of convex cells and finite PL maps or marked subpolyhedra (Finite convex cell complexes admit compatible triangulations, A PL embedded polyhedron becomes a subcomplex after subdivision).

[F2]

Three-disk PL severing transfers supplied ball parameters (Three-disk piecewise linear severing reassembles parametrized balls).

[F3]

Planar polygonal disks admit finite parameters and prescribed-boundary extensions (Finite polygonal disk parametrizations and boundary surgery).

Proof

Given: The stated data.

1.1givenF1construct

Extend j to a PL homeomorphism f:Z→Z0. Use the supplied parameter of Z to transfer j to the boundary of a convex ball, triangulate it there and on ∂Z0, and cone the boundary map from interior points. Convexity makes the matching cone-simplex maps bijective with PL inverses. Choose a common finite triangulation on which f,h,h0∘f are linear. The last two functions have exactly the same zero vertices, namely those on D, and are strictly positive at all other vertices. Cut at a number δ>0 below all their positive vertex values and below the top height. On corresponding simplices the two cuts have identical face posets: they retain the zero vertices and cut precisely the zero-positive edges. Inductively match the truncated cells, fixing j on their old boundary faces, matching the top sections by compatible face maps, and coning the remaining boundaries between interior points at height δ/2. Such points exist on every mixed face by convexity. The map preserves height on every cone simplex. This gives a PL homeomorphism fδ:Z∩{h≤δ}→Z0∩{h0≤δ} preserving height and equal to j on the old boundary. This is the explicit zero-vertex collar-leveling argument; it does not assert that the original extension f preserved height.

2.1F1F3step 1.1construct

Choose an affine function L with L(Q0)=0, L>0 on D0∖{Q0}, and L≥0 on D0: the sum of two supporting inequalities of the polygon at its vertex does this. For sufficiently small e>0, h0>eL on G0∖{Q0} and on the section h0=δ. The first assertion follows by checking the two nonzero vertices of the triangle and using affinity; the second follows from compactness and δ>0. Then W0=Z0∩{h0≤δ, h0≤eL} is a convex three-ball. Its new face A0′=Z0∩{h0=eL} is a convex polygonal disk lying below δ, and its remaining boundary A0 lies in the old boundary of Z0. It contains D0, meets G0 exactly at Q0, and misses the top section. Both boundary disks have finite PL parameters: A0′ is convex, and the complement of the relative interior of a face in a convex polyhedral sphere is a PL disk, as follows by the finite truncated-vertex planar chart and polygonal disk-extension construction. In particular ∂W0=A0∪A0′ and their intersection is their common boundary.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1construct

The retained body Z0∩{h0≥eL} is convex and has its unique height-zero point at Q0. Every new point of its boundary away from Q0 and from the unchanged attachment boundary is regular for height: at a new vertex strictly between the extrema, its convex link circle has a positive arc and a negative arc, each connected, because its lower and upper cone sections are convex; face and edge charts give the same conclusion. Choose L and then e outside the finitely many exceptional values making the new planar face horizontal or introducing a non-extremal horizontal face. This retains the strict inequalities in step 2.1. Coning the link arcs gives the local height-product charts, equivalently by the explicit two-half-space polygonal fan straightening. Pull W0,A0,A0′ back by fδ. Height preservation gives the claimed new regular charts and the single zero point Q. The disk replacement is confined below any initially prescribed positive bound by taking δ smaller.

4.1F2step 2.1step 3.1construct∎

Let E be the rest of the sphere after deleting Int⁡A. Its intersection with the pulled-back ball is ∂A by the stated transfer hypothesis. Thus E,A,A′ satisfy [F2]. The supplied ball bounded by A∪A′ and any supplied ball bounded by E∪A′ give a supplied ball bounded by E∪A. All triangulations, cuts, cones and exceptional-value exclusions used finite collections; no choice assumption is introduced.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.