Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For every polynomial p, both ker⁡p(T) and im⁡p(T) are T-invariant

Statement

Let T:V→V be an endomorphism and p∈F[x]. Both ker⁡p(T) and im⁡p(T) are invariant under T.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An endomorphism T and a polynomial p∈F[x].

[L1]

Polynomial evaluation is p(T)=∑akTk, with T0=I and Tk+1=T∘Tk (Polynomial evaluation at an endomorphism: p(T)=∑kakTk).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

By [L1] and associativity of composition, Tp(T)=p(T)T.

2.1step 1.1

If v∈ker⁡p(T), then p(T)(Tv)=T(p(T)v)=0, so Tv∈ker⁡p(T).

3.1step 1.1∎

If v∈im⁡p(T), write v=p(T)u; then Tv=p(T)(Tu) by step 1.1, so Tv∈im⁡p(T).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources