How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Polynomial-time many-one reductions compose
Statement
If and , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Languages with witnessed by a total map and witnessed by a total map , in the sense of Polynomial-time many-one reductions.
A polynomial-time many-one reduction is a total polynomial-time function preserving membership in both directions, by Polynomial-time many-one reductions.
Proof
Define . Because both and are total by [L1], the composite is also total.
For every source word , [L1] gives . So .
The function runs in polynomial time and can output only polynomially many symbols, so the length of is polynomially bounded in . Running on that output therefore still takes polynomial time in . Hence is a polynomial-time many-one reduction from to .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sanjeev Arora and Boaz Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach (standard reference, not scraped)