How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Power extension over a normal affine domain
Statement
Let be an integral affine scheme over a field whose coordinate ring is a normal domain, i.e. integrally closed in its fraction field (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, Global functions on Spec A recover A, Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains). Let be a dense open subscheme and let be such that for some integer , where the rings are compared inside . Then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integral affine scheme with normal coordinate ring , a dense open subscheme , an integer and an element with , all inside .
Global sections of an affine scheme. The canonical map is an isomorphism, so the global sections of are exactly ; in particular is a domain. (Global functions on Spec A recover A)
Integrality criterion. Let be a ring extension and let satisfy a monic polynomial with coefficients in ; then is integral over . (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains)
Integrally closed domain. Since is integrally closed in , every element of that is integral over already belongs to . (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains)
Proof
By hypothesis , so is a root of the monic polynomial ; hence is integral over .
The element lies in , so step 1.1 and the integral closedness of give . This includes the cases and trivially, and is harmless because is a field.
Remarks
- The hypothesis holds for every dense open subscheme of an integral affine scheme: restriction to the generic point injects into , and restriction from to identifies with a subring of . This hypothesis is part of the statement because only the extension of rings, not the geometry of , is used.
- The element need not be assumed nonzero: if then because is contained in a field, so the case also satisfies the conclusion .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert Steinberg, Lectures on Chevalley Groups (Yale University, 1967; notes prepared by J. Faulkner and R. Wilson) (standard reference, not scraped)