Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Power extension over a normal affine domain

Statement

Let X be an integral affine scheme over a field k whose coordinate ring A=O(X) is a normal domain, i.e. integrally closed in its fraction field (Affine schemes and their coordinate rings, Global functions on Spec A recover A, Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains). Let U⊆X be a dense open subscheme and let f∈O(U) be such that fd∈O(X) for some integer d≥1, where the rings are compared inside O(X)⊆O(U)⊆Frac⁡(A). Then f∈O(X).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integral affine scheme X with normal coordinate ring A=O(X)=Γ(X,OX), a dense open subscheme U⊆X, an integer d≥1 and an element f∈O(U) with fd∈O(X), all inside Frac⁡(A).

[F1]

Global sections of an affine scheme. The canonical map A→Γ(X,OX) is an isomorphism, so the global sections of X are exactly A=O(X); in particular O(X) is a domain. (Global functions on Spec A recover A)

[F2]

Integrality criterion. Let A⊆B be a ring extension and let b∈B satisfy a monic polynomial with coefficients in A; then b is integral over A. (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains)

[F3]

Integrally closed domain. Since A is integrally closed in Frac⁡(A), every element of Frac⁡(A) that is integral over A already belongs to A. (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

By hypothesis fd∈O(X)=A, so f is a root of the monic polynomial Td−fd∈A[T]; hence f is integral over A.

2.1F1F3step 1.1∎

The element f lies in O(U)⊆Frac⁡(A), so step 1.1 and the integral closedness of A give f∈A=O(X). This includes the cases U=X and d=1 trivially, and f=0 is harmless because Frac⁡(A) is a field.

Remarks

  • The hypothesis O(X)⊆O(U)⊆Frac⁡(A) holds for every dense open subscheme of an integral affine scheme: restriction to the generic point injects O(U) into Frac⁡(A), and restriction from X to U identifies A with a subring of O(U). This hypothesis is part of the statement because only the extension of rings, not the geometry of U, is used.
  • The element f need not be assumed nonzero: if fd=0 then f=0 because O(U)⊆Frac⁡(A) is contained in a field, so the case f=0 also satisfies the conclusion f∈O(X).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources