How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Powers of primes congruent to modulo have primitive two-square representations
Statement
Every natural power of a prime congruent to modulo has a primitive two-square representation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime and an exponent .
A two-square representation is primitive when its coordinate gcd is (Representations and primitive representations as sums of two squares).
For all integers , (The Brahmagupta–Fibonacci two-square identity).
A prime is a sum of two integer squares if and only if or (Fermat's two-square theorem for primes).
Every integer greater than has a prime divisor (Every integer has a prime divisor; indeed the least divisor of that exceeds is prime).
If a prime divides , then or (Euclid's lemma: if is prime and then or ).
If a property holds at and passes from to , it holds for every (The principle of mathematical induction).
If a positive integer is written as a finite product of powers of distinct primes, every exponent equals the corresponding canonical valuation (For and any injective list of primes containing every prime divisor of , one has ; the exponents are determined by , and for every prime outside the list).
Proof
The pair primitively represents .
By [L2], choose with . Neither coordinate is zero, and divisibility of either coordinate by would force divisibility of the other and then ; in particular divides neither coordinate. Any common prime divisor would have square dividing , so is primitive; the coordinates have opposite parity because is odd.
Assume primitively. The two sign variants in [L1] give representations of with coordinate pairs and .
If a prime divides both coordinates of either candidate, then by step 2.1. The uniqueness of prime exponents in [L6], or [L4] iterated through the power, forces .
If both candidates were coordinatewise divisible by , their sums and differences would show that divides . Since is odd and neither nor is divisible by , [L4] would give and , contradicting the induction hypothesis.
Thus at least one candidate has no common prime divisor; by [L3] its coordinate gcd cannot exceed one, so it is primitive. Step 1.1 and [L5] complete the induction.
Depends on
- Representations and primitive representations as sums of two squares
- The Brahmagupta–Fibonacci two-square identity
- Fermat's two-square theorem for primes
- Every integer $n > 1$ has a prime divisor; indeed the least divisor of $n$ that exceeds $1$ is prime
- Euclid's lemma: if $p$ is prime and $p \mid ab$ then $p \mid a$ or $p \mid b$
- The principle of mathematical induction
- For $n \ge 1$ and any injective list $p : r \to \mathbb{Z}$ of primes containing every prime divisor of $n$, one has $n = \prod_{i<r} p_i^{\,v_{p_i}(n)}$; the exponents are determined by $n$, and $v_q(n) = 0$ for every prime $q$ outside the list
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Hackman, Elementary Number Theory, Chapter E, Lemma E.II.6 (standard reference, not scraped)