How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective Verma multiplicities equal Soergel standard ranks
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a regular integral type- block with , and for let be the polynomial Soergel lift of , so that is its right reduction. Write for the graded multiplicity of the polynomial standard graph module supported at in the standard support filtration of a polynomial Soergel bimodule , in the standard-generator normalization of the polynomial Soergel category. Then for all These are ranks before reduction: the right side sums the graded standard support multiplicities of the polynomial lift, not multiplicities in any separated filtration of the finite-dimensional module .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice (inherited from the block and projective theory cited below), a regular integral type- block with , and labels .
Block and dictionary conventions (The regular integral dot-orbit labelling convention): are the indecomposable projectives, holds with the polynomial lift, standard support at corresponds to , and is the Verma-flag multiplicity.
Projective dictionary (Indecomposable projectives correspond to indecomposable Soergel modules): is an equivalence from onto the ungraded Soergel modules, with ; the inverse-label assignment is a bijection on isomorphism classes.
General rank comparison (Verma-flag multiplicities are standard-filtration ranks under V): for a projective with polynomial lift built from a decomposition , one has ; these are ranks before reduction.
Projective covers (Projective covers in O are indecomposable and unique): is a projective cover of and is indecomposable; any two projective covers of the same simple are isomorphic.
Krull–Schmidt (Fitting decomposition in a finite-length abelian category): every object of is a finite direct sum of nonzero indecomposable objects, and the decomposition is unique up to isomorphism and permutation of the summands.
Verma-flag multiplicities (Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities): is well defined for Verma-filtered , independent of the flag, and additive over the factors of any flag.
Proof
The object is a nonzero indecomposable projective of , namely a projective cover of the simple , and by the projective dictionary [F2] its Soergel value is , the right reduction of the single polynomial lift .
Every decomposition of into indecomposables is a one-summand decomposition. Indeed, by [F5] a decomposition exists and any two such decompositions agree up to isomorphism and permutation of summands; since the nonzero object is an indecomposable projective cover by [F4], only one summand can be present, so the decomposition is for a single label . Applying the equivalence of [F2] to this isomorphism gives ; as is a bijection on isomorphism classes of indecomposables, . Hence in the dictionary of [F3] the polynomial lift assigned to is the single term , with no further summands.
Substitute from step 1.2 into the general rank comparison [F3] applied to the projective : its left side is the Verma-flag multiplicity of [F1] and [F6], and its right side is , the sum of the graded standard-support multiplicities of the polynomial lift . This is the displayed identity for all . The ranks on the right are pre-reduction ranks of the polynomial lift, by the final clause of [F3] and by the reduction convention [F2]; no separated filtration of is produced or used.
Depends on
- The regular integral dot-orbit labelling convention
- Verma-flag multiplicities are standard-filtration ranks under V
- Indecomposable projectives correspond to indecomposable Soergel modules
- Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities
- Projective covers in O are indecomposable and unique
- Fitting decomposition in a finite-length abelian category
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Wolfgang Soergel, Kategorie O, perverse Garben und Moduln ueber den Koinvarianten zur Weylgruppe, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990) 421-445 (MPIM preprint 1989/46, complete German text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lin Chen, lecture notes (Spring 2024), Lecture 8: Hecke algebras and the Kazhdan-Lusztig conjecture (complete 10-page lecture) (standard reference, not scraped)