Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective Verma multiplicities equal Soergel standard ranks

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let Oλ be a regular integral type-A block with W=Sn, and for w∈W let Bw−1 be the polynomial Soergel lift of V(P(w⋅λ)), so that V(P(w⋅λ))=Bˉw−1 is its right reduction. Write rx,d(B) for the graded multiplicity of the polynomial standard graph module supported at x in the standard support filtration of a polynomial Soergel bimodule B, in the standard-generator normalization of the polynomial Soergel category. Then for all y,w∈W (P(w⋅λ):Δ(y⋅λ))=∑dry−1,d(Bw−1). These are ranks before reduction: the right side sums the graded standard support multiplicities of the polynomial lift, not multiplicities in any separated filtration of the finite-dimensional module V(P(w⋅λ)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice (inherited from the block and projective theory cited below), a regular integral type-A block Oλ with W=Sn, and labels y,w∈W.

[F1]

Block and dictionary conventions (The regular integral dot-orbit labelling convention): P(w⋅λ) are the indecomposable projectives, V(P(w⋅λ))=Bˉw−1 holds with Bw−1 the polynomial lift, standard support at x corresponds to Δ(x−1⋅λ), and (P:Δ) is the Verma-flag multiplicity.

[F2]

Projective dictionary (Indecomposable projectives correspond to indecomposable Soergel modules): V is an equivalence from Proj⁡(Oλ) onto the ungraded Soergel modules, with P(w⋅λ)↦Bˉw−1; the inverse-label assignment is a bijection on isomorphism classes.

[F3]

General rank comparison (Verma-flag multiplicities are standard-filtration ranks under V): for a projective P with polynomial lift B(P)=⨁wBw−1mw built from a decomposition P=⨁wP(w⋅λ)mw, one has (P:Δ(y⋅λ))=∑dry−1,d(B(P)); these are ranks before reduction.

[F4]

Projective covers (Projective covers in O are indecomposable and unique): P(w⋅λ) is a projective cover of L(w⋅λ) and is indecomposable; any two projective covers of the same simple are isomorphic.

[F5]

Krull–Schmidt (Fitting decomposition in a finite-length abelian category): every object of Oλ is a finite direct sum of nonzero indecomposable objects, and the decomposition is unique up to isomorphism and permutation of the summands.

[F6]

Verma-flag multiplicities (Finite Verma flags and their multiplicities): (X:Δ(μ)) is well defined for Verma-filtered X, independent of the flag, and additive over the factors of any flag.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4

The object P:=P(w⋅λ) is a nonzero indecomposable projective of Oλ, namely a projective cover of the simple L(w⋅λ), and by the projective dictionary [F2] its Soergel value is V(P)=Bˉw−1, the right reduction of the single polynomial lift Bw−1.

1.2F2F3F4F5

Every decomposition of P into indecomposables is a one-summand decomposition. Indeed, by [F5] a decomposition P≅⨁vP(v⋅λ)mv exists and any two such decompositions agree up to isomorphism and permutation of summands; since the nonzero object P is an indecomposable projective cover by [F4], only one summand can be present, so the decomposition is P≅P(v⋅λ) for a single label v. Applying the equivalence V of [F2] to this isomorphism gives Bˉw−1≅Bˉv−1; as V is a bijection on isomorphism classes of indecomposables, v=w. Hence in the dictionary of [F3] the polynomial lift assigned to P is the single term B(P)=Bw−1, with no further summands.

2.1F1F2F3F6step 1.2∎

Substitute B(P)=Bw−1 from step 1.2 into the general rank comparison [F3] applied to the projective P=P(w⋅λ): its left side is the Verma-flag multiplicity (P(w⋅λ):Δ(y⋅λ)) of [F1] and [F6], and its right side is ∑dry−1,d(Bw−1), the sum of the graded standard-support multiplicities of the polynomial lift Bw−1. This is the displayed identity for all y,w∈W. The ranks on the right are pre-reduction ranks of the polynomial lift, by the final clause of [F3] and by the reduction convention [F2]; no separated filtration of V(P(w⋅λ)) is produced or used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources