How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pythagoras and finite orthogonal sums
Statement
Let be pairwise orthogonal vectors in a real or complex inner-product space, that is whenever (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement). Then
the empty sum on the right being at .
Facts & Assumptions
Orthogonality means , the pairing is linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second, and (Orthogonality and the orthogonal complement, Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).
Every inner-product norm satisfies the parallelogram law (The parallelogram law).
Proof
Given: Pairwise orthogonal vectors in a real or complex inner-product space.
At the sum is and both sides vanish, and at the identity is .
For two orthogonal vectors , expansion gives , and the same computation with replaced by shows that the sum of a finite orthogonal family may be split off one term at a time.
Suppose the identity holds for orthogonal families of terms, , and let be pairwise orthogonal; the partial sum satisfies by linearity in the first argument, and by the induction hypothesis, so .
Induction on from the cases of step 1.1 and the induction step of step 2.1 proves the identity for every , so pairwise orthogonal vectors satisfy .
Depends on
Used by
- A separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space is ℓ² Corollary
- Distance to a closed subspace Example
- The Haar orthonormal basis of L²((0,1)) Example
- The standard basis of ℓ²(ℕ) Example
- Hilbert projections are linear, self-adjoint and contractive Lemma
- Square-summable orthogonal families have norm-convergent finite sums Lemma
- The finite Bessel inequality and best approximation by a finite orthonormal family Lemma
- A Hilbert space with a given orthonormal basis is ℓ² of the index set Theorem
- Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar Salamon, Functional Analysis, §1.3.3, p.38 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Lin and Casey Rodriguez, MIT 18.102 Introduction to Functional Analysis, Lecture 15 (standard reference, not scraped)