Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Rabinowitsch auxiliary ideal has no common zero

Statement

Let k be a field, let I⊆k[x1,…,xn] be an ideal, and let f∈k[x1,…,xn] vanish on every point of V(I). Then the ideal J:=I+(1−yf)⊆k[x1,…,xn,y] has empty zero locus.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an ideal I⊆k[x1,…,xn], and a polynomial f that vanishes on V(I).

[L1]

Evaluation at a point is well defined in a polynomial ring (Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

Suppose (a,b)∈kn+1 were a common zero of J. Then every element of I vanishes at a, so a∈V(I). By hypothesis, f(a)=0.

2.1L1step 1.1algebra∎

But 1−yf∈J, so evaluating at (a,b) gives 1−bf(a)=0. Using step 1.1 this becomes 1=0, which is impossible in a field. Therefore J has no common zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources