Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Rabinowitsch auxiliary ideal has no common zero

Statement

Let k be a field, let Ik[x1,,xn] be an ideal, and let fk[x1,,xn] vanish on every point of V(I). Then the ideal

J:=I+(1yf)k[x1,,xn,y]

has empty zero locus.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an ideal Ik[x1,,xn], and a polynomial f that vanishes on V(I).

[L1]

Evaluation at a point is well defined in a polynomial ring (Evaluation and roots of a polynomial in a commutative target ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose (a,b)kn+1 were a common zero of J. Then every element of I vanishes at a, so aV(I). By hypothesis, f(a)=0.

L1given
2.1

But 1yfJ, so evaluating at (a,b) gives 1bf(a)=0. Using step 1.1 this becomes 1=0, which is impossible in a field. Therefore J has no common zero.

L1step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources