Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Substituting y = 1/f and clearing denominators yields a power of f in I

Statement

Let k be a field, let m≥1, let I=(h1,…,hm)⊆k[x1,…,xn], and let 1=∑i=1mai(x,y)hi(x)+b(x,y)(1−yf(x)) be an identity in k[x1,…,xn,y]. Then some power fN lies in I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an integer m≥1, an ideal I=(h1,…,hm) in R:=k[x1,…,xn], a polynomial f∈R, and a unit-ideal identity for I+(1−yf).

[L1]

Localization at a multiplicative set adjoins inverses of its elements (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions).

[L2]

Localization is a ring and supports substitution of equal fractions (The localisation relation is an equivalence relation and fraction arithmetic is well defined).

[L3]

Under the Rabinowitsch hypothesis, the auxiliary ideal is the unit ideal (The auxiliary ideal is the unit ideal).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

If f=0, then f1=0∈I, so the conclusion is immediate. Hence we may assume f≠0.

2.1L1L2step 1.1givenalgebra

The hypothesis m≥1 excludes the empty generating-family case, so the finite maximum used below is defined. Let S={1,f,f2,…}⊆R. By [L1] and [L2], in the localized ring S−1R the element f/1 is invertible with inverse 1/f.

3.1L2step 2.1algebra

Substitute y=1/f into the displayed identity and view the coefficients in S−1R. The term 1−yf becomes 0, so we obtain 1=∑i=1mai(x,1/f)hi(x) in S−1R. Each coefficient ai(x,1/f) is a fraction ri/fei.

4.1L2step 1.1step 3.1algebra

Let N=max⁡iei. Multiplying the equality of step 3.1 by fN in the localization gives fN−∑i=1mrifN−eihi1=0. By the localization equality criterion, some power fM∈S annihilates the numerator in R. Since R=k[x1,…,xn] is an integral domain and step 1.1 gives f≠0, this forces fN=∑i=1mrifN−eihi already in R. The right-hand side lies in I, so fN∈I.

5.1L3step 4.1∎

Thus a power of f belongs to I. The existence of the starting identity is exactly what [L3] supplies in the Nullstellensatz application.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources