How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A compact oriented rational homology four-ball admits a Spin-c structure
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a compact connected oriented smooth four-manifold with . Then the oriented tangent frame bundle of admits a Spin lift.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the compact connected oriented smooth rational homology four-ball in the statement.
The Axiom of Choice is the original hypothesis. It covers the finite good-cover and integral cohomology suppliers; no weaker analytic branch is substituted for this topological one.
Finite good covers and integral nerve cohomology for compact smooth boundary manifolds gives a finite nerve homotopy equivalent to and coefficient-compatible cohomology comparisons, including boundary points.
Integral surface representatives and characteristic parity in a smooth four-manifold proves that every integral degree-two class has a closed oriented embedded surface representative in the interior, and that evaluates to its normal Euler number modulo two. For a torsion class this integer is zero, by its actual normal Thom class calculation.
The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID gives the coefficient-natural exact sequence . Its last map is evaluation on integral cycles.
Spin-c lifts and integral lifts of the second Stiefel–Whitney class proves, by actual Spin transition functions and finite-partition cocycles, that an integral lift of gives a Spin lift of the tangent frame bundle. It asserts existence, not an injective classification by determinant classes.
Proof
By [F1], has the homotopy type of a finite simplicial complex. Its integral chain groups are finite free abelian groups. Finite integer row and column operations, using the Euclidean algorithm, give Smith forms for their boundary maps, so each integral homology group is finitely generated. Tensoring these finite matrices with kills exactly their finite cyclic factors and preserves their free ranks. The assumed vanishing of positive rational homology therefore makes both and finite torsion groups. No assertion about a choice of infinitely many generators is needed.
Every is torsion by step 1.1. Apply [F2]: its embedded oriented surface has integer normal Euler number zero. Hence . Thus the evaluation homomorphism of [F3] with sends to zero on the entire integral group . By exactness, is the image of a class . This also covers zero , without requiring mod-two to vanish.
The coefficient lift is onto, including two-torsion. Write the finite group as a finite direct sum of cyclic groups . From the free resolution , applying gives . The coefficient reduction therefore induces the explicit map . If is odd its target is zero; if is even its target is and the reduction is onto. Finite direct sums give a surjection . When , both groups are zero and the same conclusion holds. Choose a preimage of the one class in step 2.1.
Let be the image of under the integral UCT injection. Naturality of [F3] under identifies its reduction with the mod-two UCT image of , which is exactly by step 2.1. Thus is an actual integral lift. In fact it lies in the finite Ext subgroup; no assertion that distinct such lifts label distinct Spin structures is made.
Choose a smooth Riemannian metric by a finite trivializing atlas and a smooth partition, as in the construction of [F1]. Apply [F4] to with this metric and the integral lift . Its transition-cocycle construction produces the required Spin principal bundle and its equivariant map to the oriented tangent frame bundle. This proves the original existence claim. All possible finite cyclic two-primary factors were retained in step 3.1; neither a vanishing mod-two homology assumption nor a determinant-class bijection was used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Danny Calegari, Notes on 4-Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Teichner and Elmar Vogt, All 4-Manifolds Have Spin-c Structures (standard reference, not scraped)