Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A compact oriented rational homology four-ball admits a Spin-c structure

Statement

Assume AC. Let B be a compact connected oriented smooth four-manifold with H∗(B;Q)≅H∗(point;Q). Then the oriented tangent frame bundle of B admits a Spinc lift.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the compact connected oriented smooth rational homology four-ball B in the statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is the original hypothesis. It covers the finite good-cover and integral cohomology suppliers; no weaker analytic branch is substituted for this topological one.

[F1]

Finite good covers and integral nerve cohomology for compact smooth boundary manifolds gives a finite nerve homotopy equivalent to B and coefficient-compatible cohomology comparisons, including boundary points.

[F2]

Integral surface representatives and characteristic parity in a smooth four-manifold proves that every integral degree-two class has a closed oriented embedded surface representative in the interior, and that w2(TB) evaluates to its normal Euler number modulo two. For a torsion class this integer is zero, by its actual normal Thom class calculation.

[F3]

The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID gives the coefficient-natural exact sequence 0→Ext⁡1(H1(B;Z),G)→H2(B;G)→Hom⁡(H2(B;Z),G)→0. Its last map is evaluation on integral cycles.

[F4]

Spin-c lifts and integral lifts of the second Stiefel–Whitney class proves, by actual Spin transition functions and finite-partition cocycles, that an integral lift of w2(TB) gives a Spinc lift of the tangent frame bundle. It asserts existence, not an injective classification by determinant classes.

Proof

1.1A1F1givenconstructalgebra

By [F1], B has the homotopy type of a finite simplicial complex. Its integral chain groups are finite free abelian groups. Finite integer row and column operations, using the Euclidean algorithm, give Smith forms for their boundary maps, so each integral homology group is finitely generated. Tensoring these finite matrices with Q kills exactly their finite cyclic factors and preserves their free ranks. The assumed vanishing of positive rational homology therefore makes both H1(B;Z) and H2(B;Z) finite torsion groups. No assertion about a choice of infinitely many generators is needed.

2.1F2F3step 1.1constructalgebra

Every x∈H2(B;Z) is torsion by step 1.1. Apply [F2]: its embedded oriented surface has integer normal Euler number zero. Hence ⟨w2(TB),ρ2x⟩=0. Thus the evaluation homomorphism of [F3] with G=F2 sends w2(TB) to zero on the entire integral group H2(B;Z). By exactness, w2(TB) is the image of a class v∈Ext⁡1(H1(B;Z),F2). This also covers zero H2, without requiring mod-two H2 to vanish.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

The coefficient lift is onto, including two-torsion. Write the finite group H1(B;Z) as a finite direct sum of cyclic groups Z/n. From the free resolution 0→Z→nZ→Z/n→0, applying Hom⁡(−,G) gives Ext⁡1(Z/n,G)=G/nG. The coefficient reduction therefore induces the explicit map Z/n→F2/nF2. If n is odd its target is zero; if n is even its target is F2 and the reduction is onto. Finite direct sums give a surjection Ext⁡1(H1(B),Z)→Ext⁡1(H1(B),F2). When H1=0, both groups are zero and the same conclusion holds. Choose a preimage v~ of the one class v in step 2.1.

4.1F3step 2.1step 3.1constructalgebra

Let c∈H2(B;Z) be the image of v~ under the integral UCT injection. Naturality of [F3] under Z→F2 identifies its reduction with the mod-two UCT image of v, which is exactly w2(TB) by step 2.1. Thus c is an actual integral lift. In fact it lies in the finite Ext subgroup; no assertion that distinct such lifts label distinct Spinc structures is made.

5.1A1F1F4step 4.1construct∎

Choose a smooth Riemannian metric by a finite trivializing atlas and a smooth partition, as in the construction of [F1]. Apply [F4] to B with this metric and the integral lift c. Its transition-cocycle construction produces the required Spinc(4) principal bundle and its equivariant map to the oriented tangent frame bundle. This proves the original existence claim. All possible finite cyclic two-primary factors were retained in step 3.1; neither a vanishing mod-two homology assumption nor a determinant-class bijection was used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources