Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A regular element exists by prime avoidance

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let R be Noetherian, let M≠0 be a finite R-module, and let I be an ideal such that IM≠M. Then I contains an M-regular element if and only if I⊈pfor every p∈Ass⁡R(M).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian ring R, a nonzero finite module M, and an ideal I with IM≠M (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

An element of R is a zero divisor on M exactly when it belongs to an associated prime: one direction follows from an associated element, and the other from A zero divisor is contained in an associated prime under the stated Choice hypothesis. Thus an M-regular element of I exists exactly when I is not contained in the union of the associated primes.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The associated-prime set is finite by Finite modules over Noetherian rings have finitely many associated primes under the stated Choice hypothesis. It is nonempty because 0 is a zero divisor on M≠0 and step 1.1 places every zero divisor in an associated prime. Thus An ideal contained in a finite union of prime ideals lies in one of them applies and says that I is contained in that union exactly when it is contained in one member. Combining this with step 1.1 produces a nonzerodivisor x∈I exactly under the displayed condition; M/xM≠0 because xM=M would imply IM=M. Thus x is regular in the adopted sense, proving both directions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources