How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A regular element exists by prime avoidance
Statement
Let be Noetherian, let be a finite -module, and let be an ideal such that . Then contains an -regular element if and only if
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian ring , a nonzero finite module , and an ideal with .
Proof
An element of is a zero divisor on exactly when it belongs to an associated prime: one direction follows from an associated element, and the other from the zero-divisor lemma. Thus an -regular element of exists exactly when is not contained in the union of the associated primes.
The associated-prime set is finite for a finite module over a Noetherian ring. Finite prime avoidance therefore says that is contained in that union exactly when it is contained in one member. Combining this with step 1.1 produces a nonzerodivisor exactly under the displayed condition; because would imply . Thus is regular in the adopted sense, proving both directions.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Depth and Cohen--Macaulay modules source treatment (standard reference, not scraped)