Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Dualizing complexes and coherent biduality for regular-ring quotients

Statement

Assume AC. Let A be a regular Noetherian ring of finite dimension n, let L be an invertible A-module, and let B=A/I be nonzero. For any integer s, DB=RHom⁡A(B,L[s]) is a dualizing complex over B. For M∈Dfinb(B), DB(M)=RHom⁡B(M,DB) belongs to Dfinb(B) and the canonical evaluation M→DBDB(M) is an isomorphism. These assertions localize, so apply to the affine restrictions of a regular closed projective embedding.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A,B,L,s and AC as above.

[F1]

A regular finite-dimensional Noetherian ring has global dimension equal to its dimension (localisation and polynomial extension of regular rings). Global dimension is also the supremum of injective dimensions (global dimension is detected on cyclic modules).

[F2]

Derived coinduction and its adjunction are Derived adjunction for finite rings and closed immersions.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

Every finite A-module has a bounded resolution by finite projective modules: finite generation of each kernel follows from Noetherianity, and the nth syzygy is projective by the global-dimension bound. Bounded complexes with finite cohomology are perfect as well, by truncation triangles and cones of such resolutions. For a bounded finite-projective complex P, the ordinary termwise map P→Hom⁡A(Hom⁡A(P,L[s]),L[s]) is an isomorphism of complexes with the signed evaluation convention: the two shifts and the two factors of L cancel. Thus RHom⁡A(−,L[s]) has coherent biduality.

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

By [F1], L has a bounded injective resolution I∙. Applying Hom⁡A(B,−) gives a bounded complex of injective B-modules by [F2], representing DB. Its cohomology is finite over A, since B has a finite projective resolution, and the B-action makes it finite over B. For bounded finite B-cohomology, the adjunction identifies the underlying A-complex of DB(M) with RHom⁡A(M,L[s]), so it too has bounded finite cohomology.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Apply that adjunction twice. The underlying A-complex of DBDB(M) becomes the ambient double dual in step 1.1. Under these adjunctions the canonical B-evaluation becomes the ambient evaluation: both send an element m to the functional φ↦φ(m), followed by evaluation at 1∈B; resolving gives the same signed identity for complexes. It is therefore a quasi-isomorphism after forgetting the B-action, hence a quasi-isomorphism over B. At M=B, the identification DB(B)=DB shows that B→RHom⁡B(DB,DB) is precisely the homothety isomorphism. Together with step 2.1 this proves all conditions in [F3] and biduality. Finite projective resolutions show that derived Hom and evaluation commute with localization, so the construction agrees on intersections of affine charts. AC is used in the ambient global-dimension and resolution suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources