Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical modules transform by the exceptional divisor at a regular point blowup

Statement

Assume AC and DC. For the point blowup b:X′→X of a regular Noetherian surface in the fixed regular-base dualizing setting, with exceptional divisor E, there is a canonical generic-compatible identification ωX′=b∗ωX⊗OX′(E).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The point blowup b ⁣:X′→X of a regular Noetherian surface X at a closed point x in the fixed regular-base dualizing setting, with exceptional divisor E, and ωX the regular-base canonical module.

[F1]

def-axiom-of-choice. The Axiom of Choice (AC) is the following statement. > Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function > (def-choice-function). Written out: for every set F all of whose members are nonempty, there exists a function g with domain F satisfying g(S)∈S for all S∈F. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F2]

def-dependent-choice. Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain)

[F3]

lem-affine-point-blowup-pushforward-vanishing. Assume the Axiom of Choice, inherited from the Proj construction and from the cohomology suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). (Pushforward and vanishing for an affine point blowup)

[F4]

lem-relative-projective-space-derived-duality-regular-local-base. Assume AC and DC. Let R be regular Noetherian local of finite dimension and P=PRN. Write W=OP(−N−1). Laurent residue gives t:RΓ(P,W[N])→R. For every K∈DCohb(P), evaluation followed by t gives a natural quasi-isomorphism RΓ(P,R ⁣HomP(K,W[N]))≅RHom⁡R(RΓ(P,K),R). (Relative derived duality on projective space over a regular local ring)

[F5]

lem-finite-closed-immersion-derived-coinduction-adjunction. Assume AC. For a finite homomorphism A→B of Noetherian rings and G∈D+(A), the complex f!G=RHom⁡A(B,G) has its natural B-action and is right adjoint to restriction of scalars. (Derived adjunction for finite rings and closed immersions)

[F6]

lem-normal-projective-surface-dualizing-module-over-regular-local-base. Assume AC and DC. Let R be a regular Noetherian local ring of dimension two, let A be a finite normal local R-domain of dimension two, with R↪A local, and let X be a normal integral scheme of dimension two projective over R, with a proper birational map f:X→Spec⁡A. Put ωA=Hom⁡R(A,R). (Dualizing modules and trace pairing for normal projective surface modifications)

[F7]

lem-regular-base-dualizing-traces-compose-on-rational-modifications. Assume AC and DC. Let R be regular local of dimension two, A finite normal local over R, and let g:X′→X be a morphism of projective normal modifications over A. Their regular-base dualizing complexes are independent of the chosen projective embeddings up to the unique isomorphism preserving their duality pairings. (Dualizing traces compose and become isomorphisms on rational modifications)

Proof

1.1F3given

The assertion is local at the centre, so let T=OX,x with regular parameters u,v and trivialize ωX near x; over Spec⁡T the blowup is realized as the Cartier hypersurface uV−vU=0 in PT1 with two affine charts, and the tautological twisting sheaf satisfies O(1)=O(−E) on X′.

2.1F2F4step 1.1

Relative Laurent duality on PT1 identifies its relative dualizing complex with O(−2)[1] over the base dualizing module T[2], with the Laurent residue as trace and with the evaluation identities natural in the tested complex; shifts and tensor twists are respected.

3.1F5step 2.1

The hypersurface X′ is cut out by the invertible ideal O(−1), so Cartier coinduction applied to the resolution 0→O(−1)→O→OX′→0 multiplies the relative canonical line by O(1) and subtracts one shift; using O(1)=O(−E) gives the local identification ωX′=b∗ωX⊗OX′(E), i.e. the canonical line of the surface X′ is the pulled-back base line twisted by the exceptional divisor.

4.1F6F7step 3.1

Outside the centre b is an isomorphism and the identification is the tautological one; on overlaps the two local identifications induce the same identification of duality pairings, so by the representing-property uniqueness of the regular-base dualizing module they glue to a canonical generic-compatible identification ωX′=b∗ωX⊗OX′(E) on all of X′, compatible with the traces along further blowups.

5.1F1F2step 4.1∎

The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice are inherited from the duality, coinduction and blowup suppliers; this is a local Koszul/Laurent computation and does not assert any formula for a blowup at a singular point.

Remarks

  • The identification is generic-compatible: it restricts to the fixed trivialization of ωX over the punctured neighbourhood.
  • Only regular centres are treated; the singular-centre case is deliberately excluded.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

53 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources