How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative separation of an open convex set from an exterior point
Statement
Assume HB. If is a nonempty open convex subset of a real or complex normed space and , there is a nonzero such that Over the real field, the real-part symbol is redundant.
Facts & Assumptions
Under HB a real-linear dominated functional extends, with upper bound and lower bound (Dominated extension conditional on the relative principle).
An open convex neighbourhood of zero has a sublinear gauge with and whenever (The open convex gauge is sublinear and recovers its set).
For real-linear on a complex space, is complex-linear with real part (A complex linear functional is recovered from its real part by f(x)=u(x)-iu(ix)).
Proof
Given: HB, a nonempty open convex , and .
Fix , set and . Then and , hence . If and , then . A ball in about translates to a ball of the same radius in about , so is open. Fix with .
Let . Its gauge is finite and sublinear on the underlying real space, nonnegative everywhere, and bounded above by . Because , .
The set is a real linear subspace. Since , has a unique real coefficient , and defines a real-linear functional. For , ; for , . This checks domination on every element of M, including zero.
Applying relative dominated extension on the underlying real gives real-linear extending and satisfying . The two gauge upper bounds imply , so . Also .
Over put . Over put ; reconstruction gives complex linearity and real part , and . Thus in either field , and it is nonzero because . The explicit bounds give continuity: in both cases.
For every , , so . Adding gives , as required.
Source notes
Brezis Lemma 1.3, pp.6–7; Teschl Theorems 5.2–5.3, pp.138–139.
Remarks
The continuity estimate uses both and . It does not infer from .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Haim Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, §§1.1–1.2 and §1.3 evaluation paragraph (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Topics in Real and Functional Analysis, Theorems 4.13–4.20 and §5.1 (2018 university-hosted copy) (standard reference, not scraped)