How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative homology Mayer–Vietoris for closed supports
Statement
Let be closed subsets of a space , and let be a commutative unital ring. Write . There is an exact sequence where is the pair of restrictions and . Empty supports and zero coefficients are included. No AC is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Relative singular homology defines relative chains as the quotient of singular chains by the subspace chain complex.
Relative cup product for an excisive triad proves that for two subspaces open in their union the canonical map is a chain homotopy equivalence, by the explicit construction before dualization.
The long exact sequence in homology gives the long exact homology sequence of a short exact sequence of chain complexes.
Proof
Given: as stated. Put , , , , and .
The singular simplex generators common to and are exactly the maps with image in . Hence , including for the zero ring. The chain maps given by and , are well-defined and commute with boundary because are subcomplexes.
The map is injective since a representative mapping to zero lies in both and . The map is onto since , and . If , write with . Then has residues in and in , so . This proves exactness in every degree; the argument uses only the existence of a decomposition for one element of .
By De Morgan's laws, and . The first two nonzero complexes in step 1.1 therefore have exactly the relative homology groups displayed in the statement. Since are open, [F2] identifies the homology of the final quotient with . Applying [F3] to step 2.1 yields the asserted sequence. Composition of with this canonical quotient map is the difference of the two relative quotient maps, so the printed sign is precisely .
If , then , , and the sequence reduces to identity maps on the groups supported in , with zero groups for empty support; the other empty case is symmetric. If , the diagonal and difference sequence has the stated exactness. For , or negative chain degrees all complexes concerned are zero. Degree zero follows from the same degreewise short exact sequence, with no reduced-group substitution. All singular generators, including degenerate ones, were retained in step 1.1. The quotient equivalence in [F2] uses prescribed small-chain operators; no AC or choice of a splitting is required.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Lemma 3.27 proof, first exact sequence, p.237 (standard reference, not scraped)