Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative homology Mayer–Vietoris for closed supports

Statement

Let A,B be closed subsets of a space X, and let R be a commutative unital ring. Write Hk(XK;R)=Hk(X,XK;R). There is an exact sequence Hk+1(XAB;R)Hk(XAB;R)jHk(XA;R)Hk(XB;R)qHk(XAB;R), where j is the pair of restrictions and q(a,b)=aABbAB. Empty supports and zero coefficients are included. No AC is used.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Relative singular homology defines relative chains as the quotient of singular chains by the subspace chain complex.

[F2]

Relative cup product for an excisive triad proves that for two subspaces U,V open in their union the canonical map C(X)/(C(U)+C(V))C(X)/C(UV) is a chain homotopy equivalence, by the explicit P=1dEEd construction before dualization.

[F3]

The long exact sequence in homology gives the long exact homology sequence of a short exact sequence of chain complexes.

Proof

Given: X,A,B,R as stated. Put U=XA, V=XB, C=C(X;R), D=C(U;R), and E=C(V;R).

1.1

The singular simplex generators common to D and E are exactly the maps with image in UV. Hence DE=C(UV;R), including for the zero ring. The chain maps 0C/(DE)j(C/D)(C/E)qC/(D+E)0, given by j[c]=([c],[c]) and q([a],[b])=[ab], are well-defined and commute with boundary because D,E are subcomplexes.

F1given
2.1

The map j is injective since a representative mapping to zero lies in both D and E. The map q is onto since q([a],0)=[a], and qj=0. If q([a],[b])=0, write ab=d+e with dD,eE. Then c=ad=b+e has residues [a] in C/D and [b] in C/E, so j[c]=([a],[b]). This proves exactness in every degree; the argument uses only the existence of a decomposition for one element of D+E.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

By De Morgan's laws, UV=X(AB) and UV=X(AB). The first two nonzero complexes in step 1.1 therefore have exactly the relative homology groups displayed in the statement. Since U,V are open, [F2] identifies the homology of the final quotient with H(XAB;R). Applying [F3] to step 2.1 yields the asserted sequence. Composition of q with this canonical quotient map is the difference of the two relative quotient maps, so the printed sign is precisely aABbAB.

F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

If A=, then U=X, D=C, and the sequence reduces to identity maps on the groups supported in B, with zero groups for empty support; the other empty case is symmetric. If A=B, the diagonal and difference sequence has the stated exactness. For X=, R=0 or negative chain degrees all complexes concerned are zero. Degree zero follows from the same degreewise short exact sequence, with no reduced-group substitution. All singular generators, including degenerate ones, were retained in step 1.1. The quotient equivalence in [F2] uses prescribed small-chain operators; no AC or choice of a splitting is required.

F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources