Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local normal form for a line bundle on a projective-line bundle

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let π:E→S be a Zariski locally trivial P1-bundle of complex schemes, and let L be an invertible sheaf whose degree on every geometric fibre is the same integer n. There is a Zariski open cover {U} of S on which a trivialization EU≅PU1 can be chosen and an invertible sheaf MU on U for which L∣EU≅OPU1(n)⊗π∗MU. In that chart MU=π∗(L(−n))∣U, and the isomorphism is the adjunction evaluation map after the twist by O(n).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: E/S, L and n as in the statement; work on an affine open U=Spec⁡A inside a chosen bundle trivialization and put F=L∣EU⊗O(−n).

[F1]

For a proper morphism of finite presentation over any ring and a finitely presented sheaf flat over the base, there is a bounded finite projective complex K whose cohomology after every ring change A→A′ computes the cohomology of the changed sheaf, naturally in A′. (Universal finite projective cohomology complex over any base)

[F2]

The two-chart calculation for Pk1 over a field gives H0(O)=k and Hq(O)=0 for q>0; the same holds over every field extension. (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space)

[F3]

The projective line over a ring A has two standard affine charts, each isomorphic to Spec⁡A[t], with overlap Spec⁡A[t,t−1]; over a field k the twist O(m) has transition tm in the chosen frame convention. The polynomial ring A[t]=⨁j≥0Atj is free and hence flat over A. Localising a coefficientwise injection of polynomial modules preserves injectivity, so the local rings of these charts are flat over the corresponding local rings of A. Thus PA1→Spec⁡A is flat. Quasi-coherent sheaves on an affine scheme correspond to modules, and an invertible sheaf is locally free of rank one. (Relative projective space from standard charts, Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules, Invertible sheaves)

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

1.1F3algebragiven

First check the fibre classification used below. Over any field k, an invertible sheaf on each affine chart of [F3] is free: a rank-one projective module over the Euclidean rings k[t] and k[t−1] is free, since its corresponding invertible fractional ideal is generated by the greatest common divisor of finitely many generators. After choosing two frames, the overlap transition is a unit in k[t,t−1], necessarily ctm for c∈k× and m∈Z: comparison of the highest and lowest exponents in a Laurent polynomial and its inverse leaves one monomial. Rescaling a frame removes c, so [F3] identifies the line bundle with O(m). Its degree is m by the transition convention. Consequently each geometric fibre of F=L(−n) is O, by the constant fibre degree hypothesis.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1

The projection PA1→Spec⁡A is proper and of finite presentation. It is flat by [F3]. The invertible sheaf F is locally free of rank one over OPA1, so it is finitely presented and each stalk Fx is flat over Aπ(x): locally Fx≅OPA1,x, which is flat over Aπ(x) by [F3]. These are the base-flatness hypotheses of [F1]. Apply [F1] to obtain a bounded finite projective complex K with Hq(K⊗AA′)≅Hq(PA′1,FA′) for every A-algebra A′. For each prime p choose an algebraic closure k of κ(p). By step 1.1, Fk≅OPk1, so [F2] gives H0(K⊗Ak)=k and Hq(K⊗Ak)=0 for q≠0. Field extension from κ(p) to k is faithful and the terms of K are finite projective; hence the same one-dimensional degree-zero pattern holds over κ(p).

3.1F1step 2.1algebra

Localize A at p and choose free bases for the finite projective terms of K. If a differential matrix has a nonzero entry modulo the maximal ideal, that entry is a unit in Ap; elementary row and column operations split off the two-term identity complex Ap→1Ap without changing cohomology after any base change. Repeat from the highest degree down. The remaining differential matrices vanish modulo the maximal ideal. Their fibre cohomology is then the underlying graded vector space; by step 2.1 it has one basis vector in degree zero and none elsewhere. Thus the remaining complex is Ap in degree zero. The finitely many inverted pivots remain units on a principal open D(a)∋p, so the same splitting holds over Aa and H0(K)∣D(a) is free of rank one, with all higher cohomology zero. The opens D(a) cover U; hence M:=π∗F=H0(K) is invertible, and the universal comparison of [F1] identifies M⊗AA′ with H0(PA′1,FA′) on each such open for every A′.

4.1F2step 1.1step 3.1

The adjunction evaluation π∗M→F is a morphism of invertible sheaves. On every geometric fibre its map on H0 is the identity k→H0(Pk1,O)=k under step 3.1, hence it is the standard nonzero constant section of O and an isomorphism at every point of that fibre. A map of line bundles is locally multiplication by one function; if its residue in every geometric fibre is a unit, that function is outside every maximal ideal and is a unit. Thus evaluation is an isomorphism on EU. Tensoring by O(n) yields the displayed normal form with M=π∗(L(−n)). These constructions commute with restriction of U.

5.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

The universal finite-projective complex of [F1] supplies the arbitrary-base and arbitrary-ring-change comparison used in steps 2.1 and 3.1. The local degree-zero collapse of step 3.1 and evaluation argument of step 4.1 complete the normal form without a separate base-change theorem. AC is inherited through [F1]–[F3] and the choices of finite bases and field extensions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources