How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Local normal form for a line bundle on a projective-line bundle
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Zariski locally trivial -bundle of complex schemes, and let be an invertible sheaf whose degree on every geometric fibre is the same integer . There is a Zariski open cover of on which a trivialization can be chosen and an invertible sheaf on for which In that chart , and the isomorphism is the adjunction evaluation map after the twist by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , and as in the statement; work on an affine open inside a chosen bundle trivialization and put .
For a proper morphism of finite presentation over any ring and a finitely presented sheaf flat over the base, there is a bounded finite projective complex whose cohomology after every ring change computes the cohomology of the changed sheaf, naturally in . (Universal finite projective cohomology complex over any base)
The two-chart calculation for over a field gives and for ; the same holds over every field extension. (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space)
The projective line over a ring has two standard affine charts, each isomorphic to , with overlap ; over a field the twist has transition in the chosen frame convention. The polynomial ring is free and hence flat over . Localising a coefficientwise injection of polynomial modules preserves injectivity, so the local rings of these charts are flat over the corresponding local rings of . Thus is flat. Quasi-coherent sheaves on an affine scheme correspond to modules, and an invertible sheaf is locally free of rank one. (Relative projective space from standard charts, Affine quasi-coherent sheaves are modules, Invertible sheaves)
The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
First check the fibre classification used below. Over any field , an invertible sheaf on each affine chart of [F3] is free: a rank-one projective module over the Euclidean rings and is free, since its corresponding invertible fractional ideal is generated by the greatest common divisor of finitely many generators. After choosing two frames, the overlap transition is a unit in , necessarily for and : comparison of the highest and lowest exponents in a Laurent polynomial and its inverse leaves one monomial. Rescaling a frame removes , so [F3] identifies the line bundle with . Its degree is by the transition convention. Consequently each geometric fibre of is , by the constant fibre degree hypothesis.
The projection is proper and of finite presentation. It is flat by [F3]. The invertible sheaf is locally free of rank one over , so it is finitely presented and each stalk is flat over : locally , which is flat over by [F3]. These are the base-flatness hypotheses of [F1]. Apply [F1] to obtain a bounded finite projective complex with for every -algebra . For each prime choose an algebraic closure of . By step 1.1, , so [F2] gives and for . Field extension from to is faithful and the terms of are finite projective; hence the same one-dimensional degree-zero pattern holds over .
Localize at and choose free bases for the finite projective terms of . If a differential matrix has a nonzero entry modulo the maximal ideal, that entry is a unit in ; elementary row and column operations split off the two-term identity complex without changing cohomology after any base change. Repeat from the highest degree down. The remaining differential matrices vanish modulo the maximal ideal. Their fibre cohomology is then the underlying graded vector space; by step 2.1 it has one basis vector in degree zero and none elsewhere. Thus the remaining complex is in degree zero. The finitely many inverted pivots remain units on a principal open , so the same splitting holds over and is free of rank one, with all higher cohomology zero. The opens cover ; hence is invertible, and the universal comparison of [F1] identifies with on each such open for every .
The adjunction evaluation is a morphism of invertible sheaves. On every geometric fibre its map on is the identity under step 3.1, hence it is the standard nonzero constant section of and an isomorphism at every point of that fibre. A map of line bundles is locally multiplication by one function; if its residue in every geometric fibre is a unit, that function is outside every maximal ideal and is a unit. Thus evaluation is an isomorphism on . Tensoring by yields the displayed normal form with . These constructions commute with restriction of .
The universal finite-projective complex of [F1] supplies the arbitrary-base and arbitrary-ring-change comparison used in steps 2.1 and 3.1. The local degree-zero collapse of step 3.1 and evaluation argument of step 4.1 complete the normal form without a separate base-change theorem. AC is inherited through [F1]–[F3] and the choices of finite bases and field extensions.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Cohomology of Schemes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jacob Lurie, A Proof of the Borel–Weil–Bott Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)