Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rank-sensitive layer recursion for ReLU regions

Statement

Let n0,L,n1,…,nL≥1 be integers, consider a layered ReLU network of input dimension n0 and hidden widths n1,…,nL, and let r∈N0. Set RL+1(r)=1 and, for 1≤ℓ≤L, define Rℓ(r)=∑j=0min⁡(r,nℓ)(nℓj)Rℓ+1 ⁣(min⁡{r,nℓ−j}). After layers ℓ,…,L, any activation cell whose current affine image has dimension at most r produces at most Rℓ(r) activation cells.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A layered ReLU network with widths n0,n1,…,nL, a layer index ℓ, and an affine image of dimension at most r.

[F1]

An arrangement of n affine hyperplanes in dimension r has at most ∑j=0min⁡(r,n)(nj) full-dimensional regions (Hyperplane arrangement upper count and general-position count).

[F2]

Each hidden unit applies ρ(z)=max⁡{0,z} to its affine preactivation (ReLU feedforward networks and complexity conventions).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2choosealgebra

An empty current cell has no descendants. Otherwise let E be the affine hull of the current cell's image, with dim⁡E=s≤r, and write the restricted preactivations as a1,…,anℓ. There are finitely many realized active subsets A; choose one image point yA for each. Choose δ>0 smaller than every positive number among the ai(yA), taking any positive δ if there are none. At each witness, ai(yA)−δ is strictly positive exactly for i∈A and strictly negative otherwise. Thus every original pattern, including a boundary-only pattern, occurs in a distinct full-dimensional chamber of the shifted affine functions on E. Constant restrictions have fixed strict signs and add no hyperplanes. By [F1], there are at most S=∑j=0min⁡(r,nℓ)(nℓj) such patterns; for s=0 there is at most one. For a fixed A, the original pattern constraints are affine strict or weak half-spaces on the current cell, so they define at most one convex subcell. By [F2], the layer output there keeps the coordinates in A and sets the others to zero, so its affine image dimension is at most min⁡(r,∣A∣).

2.1step 1.1inductionalgebra∎

Backward induction in the displayed recurrence shows that Rℓ+1(s) is nondecreasing in s: increasing s adds nonnegative terms and does not decrease any argument. Therefore, among at most S distinct active subsets its sum is maximized by choosing the S subsets of largest cardinality. Those can be taken to have sizes nℓ−j with multiplicities (nℓj) for 0≤j≤min⁡(r,nℓ); their total number is exactly S. The associated next dimensions are at most min⁡(r,nℓ−j), giving the displayed recurrence. Induction backward from RL+1=1 proves the claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources