How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Logarithmic-size ReLU approximation of the square
Statement
For every , there is a ReLU network such that , , and the depth, number of weights, and number of computation units are each at most for an absolute constant .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The tent-map network and interval properties in Tent-map iterates and ReLU implementation, and .
For every , is a ReLU network with hidden units and weights, and its affine intervals are the uniform dyadic intervals (Tent-map iterates and ReLU implementation).
Proof
Let be the linear interpolant of at the dyadic nodes . On each interval of , the difference is zero at its endpoints and has height at the midpoint. By [F1], is the unit tent on each such interval, so . Since , telescoping gives . To implement this with shared computation, set and for each use one hidden layer with and , then define the affine expression . Thus and the iterates use only hidden units in sequential layers. The final affine output reads the input and all hidden units, with coefficient on and contribution from layer , so it computes with only additional skip connections.
On a dyadic interval of length , linear interpolation of has error , whose maximum is . Choose with . Then approximates within and .
The shared sequential construction in step 1.1 computes all required iterates in hidden layers, and its affine skip readout computes using weights. The resulting network has units, weights, and depth, and by the choice of . Taking proves the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dmitry Yarotsky, Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networks, Proposition 2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael J. Sullivan, Deep Learning Theory, §5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)