How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The rho-shift intertwines the dot and ordinary Weyl actions
Statement
Let be the translation operator on polynomial functions on defined by
Then is invariant under the dot action of if and only if is invariant under the ordinary action of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Weyl-group element , the Weyl vector , and the dot action .
The Weyl group acts linearly on , and the dot action is defined by (Root reflections and the Weyl group action, The Weyl vector rho for a chosen positive system).
Proof
If is dot-invariant, then for every and one has because [F1] gives
Conversely, if is ordinarily -invariant, then for every and , [F1] gives So is dot-invariant.
Thus translation by converts the dot action into the ordinary Weyl action and intertwines their invariant polynomials.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yiannis Sakellaridis, Verma Modules and the Category O (standard reference, not scraped)